Jersey number/scorebook question

[Stat-Man]

Originally Posted by mick

You may be screwed either way.
Whack him and your are overly officious.
Let is it slide and you're not following the rules.
Do what you deem will suit the game situation.

Seems you did.

I recently had a CYO game where an opposing player showed up late that wasn't on their original list submitted. The coach reported the addition and I let him know I'd have to see what the officials said. Officials decided not to whack, and that was fine.

Conversely, I had a MS game where the coach had 3 or 4 numbers entered correctly. They passed on the first discovery (not a big deal), but when the other players are discovered, they don't want to whack either. I can understand the philosophy, but they coach still has a responsibility to get the names/numbers right. The officials did somewhat begrudgingly give the subsequent violation a whack and have the coach check her lineup for any other changes that needed to be made.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by Stat-Man

The officials did somewhat begrudgingly give the subsequent violation a whack and have the coach check her lineup for any other changes that needed to be made.

Don't the rules limit this to one "whack"?

[mick]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Originally Posted by Stat-Man
The officials did somewhat begrudgingly give the subsequent violation a whack and have the coach check her lineup for any other changes that needed to be made.

Don't the rules limit this to one "whack"?

I think Stat-Man was showing that the officials decided to get the coach over there and take care of other possible mistakes so the interruptions finally end and the game can go on.

[BillyMac]

Originally Posted by mick

I think Stat-Man was showing that the officials decided to get the coach over there and take care of other possible mistakes so the interruptions finally end and the game can go on.

"Never Mind"

http://re3.yt-thm-a03.yimg.com/image/25/m8/4130755237

[WhistlesAndStripes]

Originally Posted by BillyMac

Don't the rules limit this to one "whack"?

Yes, they do. And this "whack" on the SUBSEQUENT violation could be that ONE, since they passed on the "whack" the first time around.