The phrase "no call."

[Beemer]

Well, JR, I beleive both of us are wrong at times, and I'm right less often that you. This arguement is a dead end.
I read 4-27 and get what its saying about incidental contact. The idea of advantage is in there, but not expressly written.

P.S. Andy Pettitt helped me write this.

Also I don't think my complete idea got across: illegal action could result in a foul, or violation. I think when it is thought of in terms of a violation it hits the points better, although I will agree the OP is talking about fouls.

Situations:

• Whistle on an illegal action deemed to affect play (advantage) = a good call
• Whistle on a legal play = a bad call
• No whistle on an illegal action deemed to not affect play (no advantage) = a good no call
• No whistle on an illegal action deemed to affect play (advantage) = a bad no call