Technical or intentional?
 

After a made FT the D reaches over the line and grabs the player with the ball. Is this a technical or intentional foul?

The ball is live, if you think the action is intentional then it is an intentional foul.
The few times that I have seen this dumb situation is a team trying to stop the clock with a handfull of seconds left.

Hit the ball, it's a T.

Foul the thrower, it's an intentional personal foul.

I'm not even sure this is basketball.

T if there's no contact with the player with the ball, intentional if there is.

It has nothing to do with what you think.

It's intentional BY RULE.

He grabs the thrower that is out of bounds after the made FT?

Can you still run the end line after the foul shot?

Dude, what are you talking about?

Read about post

Read about post?

He wants to know if A is permitted to run the endline during the throw-in following the 2 fouls shots. It's a great question, given that A could run the endline before the foul.

According to the book, no question it is an intentional foul, but there will be someone that literally interprets this and puts common sense aside.

In the OP, there was a FT.

If you call the intentional foul, there are FTs.

He did not explain which situation he was asking about.

And I have no idea what the other question was about.

I'm not sure what you're saying above.

I only know that you said "if you think the action is intentional then it is an intentional foul." That was incorrect.

I see your point......... the answer to the question is that it is intentional