Technical or intentional?
 

After a made FT the D reaches over the line and grabs the player with the ball. Is this a technical or intentional foul?

The ball is live, if you think the action is intentional then it is an intentional foul.
The few times that I have seen this dumb situation is a team trying to stop the clock with a handfull of seconds left.

Hit the ball, it's a T.

Foul the thrower, it's an intentional personal foul.

I'm not even sure this is basketball.

T if there's no contact with the player with the ball, intentional if there is.

It has nothing to do with what you think.

It's intentional BY RULE.

He grabs the thrower that is out of bounds after the made FT?

Can you still run the end line after the foul shot?

Dude, what are you talking about?

Read about post

Read about post?

He wants to know if A is permitted to run the endline during the throw-in following the 2 fouls shots. It's a great question, given that A could run the endline before the foul.

According to the book, no question it is an intentional foul, but there will be someone that literally interprets this and puts common sense aside.

In the OP, there was a FT.

If you call the intentional foul, there are FTs.

He did not explain which situation he was asking about.

And I have no idea what the other question was about.

I'm not sure what you're saying above.

I only know that you said "if you think the action is intentional then it is an intentional foul." That was incorrect.

I see your point......... the answer to the question is that it is intentional

Yes, and then B takes the ball OOB...

Yes...

He wants to know if A is permitted to run the endline during the throw-in following the 2 fouls shots. It's a great question, given that A could run the endline before the foul.

If you believed that, you would have already answered him instead of trying to convince yourself and me. :D

No the player can't run after the FT's for the Intentional foul. Two shots "spot" throw-in nearest spot of the foul.

Thanks Gimlet. That's been bugging Jughead the entire thread. :p

Good to know! I never knew that! :p

What bugs me is I never got any royalties from....

http://www.gabbytoys.com/images/Funko/830395000435.jpg

You should sue. http://www.runemasterstudios.com/gra...mages/evil.gif

Correct. That was a rule change in the 2004-05 season when the word "common" was added to 7-5-7.
Here is the current case book play:

7.5.7 SITUATION D: Team A scores a field goal. B1 picks up the ball and steps out of bounds at the end line to prepare for a throw-in. Before the throw-in is completed, A2 is called for an intentional (or flagrant) foul on B3 near the end line. RULING: B3 would shoot the two free throws for the intentional (or flagrant) foul with the lane cleared. Team B will then have a designated spot throw-in on the end line. (7-5-4b)

The rule was changed to allow the baseline to still be run, this I cannot find if it applies to a intentional foul?

Bug, re-read Nevadaref's post directly before yours. He answers your question directly. The team retains the right to run the endline only after a violation or COMMON foul.

I don't have a rule book with me, but I thought that the proper call was "intentional foul" if an opponent contacts the thrower out of bounds. I write for clarification just because someone might read "foul the thrower" and apply common foul judgment (e.g., yeah, he contacted him out of bounds, but the contact wasn't signficant enough to call...). It is my understanding that ANY contact with the ball while in possession of the thrower is a T (as you indicated) and ANY contact with the thrower is an intentional foul. Perhaps someone with a book could clarify.