Technical or intentional?

[JugglingReferee]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

In the OP, there was a [made] FT.

Yes, and then B takes the ball OOB...

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

If you call the intentional foul, there are FTs.

Yes...

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

He did not explain which situation he was asking about.

He wants to know if A is permitted to run the endline during the throw-in following the 2 fouls shots. It's a great question, given that A could run the endline before the foul.

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee

He wants to know if A is permitted to run the endline during the throw-in following the 2 fouls shots. It's a great question, given that A could run the endline before the foul.

If you believed that, you would have already answered him instead of trying to convince yourself and me.

[Gimlet25id]

Originally Posted by JugglingReferee

He wants to know if A is permitted to run the endline during the throw-in following the 2 fouls shots. It's a great question, given that A could run the endline before the foul.

No the player can't run after the FT's for the Intentional foul. Two shots "spot" throw-in nearest spot of the foul.

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by Gimlet25id

No the player can't run after the FT's for the Intentional foul. Two shots "spot" throw-in nearest spot of the foul.

Thanks Gimlet. That's been bugging Jughead the entire thread.

[JugglingReferee]

Originally Posted by Gimlet25id

No the player can't run after the FT's for the Intentional foul. Two shots "spot" throw-in nearest spot of the foul.

Good to know! I never knew that!

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

Thanks Gimlet. That's been bugging Jughead the entire thread.

What bugs me is I never got any royalties from....

[BktBallRef]

You should sue.

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Gimlet25id

No the player can't run after the FT's for the Intentional foul. Two shots "spot" throw-in nearest spot of the foul.

Correct. That was a rule change in the 2004-05 season when the word "common" was added to 7-5-7.
Here is the current case book play:

7.5.7 SITUATION D: Team A scores a field goal. B1 picks up the ball and steps out of bounds at the end line to prepare for a throw-in. Before the throw-in is completed, A2 is called for an intentional (or flagrant) foul on B3 near the end line. RULING: B3 would shoot the two free throws for the intentional (or flagrant) foul with the lane cleared. Team B will then have a designated spot throw-in on the end line. (7-5-4b)

[secondregionbug]

The rule was changed to allow the baseline to still be run, this I cannot find if it applies to a intentional foul?

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by secondregionbug

The rule was changed to allow the baseline to still be run, this I cannot find if it applies to a intentional foul?

Bug, re-read Nevadaref's post directly before yours. He answers your question directly. The team retains the right to run the endline only after a violation or COMMON foul.

[bgtg19]

Originally Posted by BktBallRef

Hit the ball, it's a T.

Foul the thrower, it's an intentional personal foul.

I don't have a rule book with me, but I thought that the proper call was "intentional foul" if an opponent contacts the thrower out of bounds. I write for clarification just because someone might read "foul the thrower" and apply common foul judgment (e.g., yeah, he contacted him out of bounds, but the contact wasn't signficant enough to call...). It is my understanding that ANY contact with the ball while in possession of the thrower is a T (as you indicated) and ANY contact with the thrower is an intentional foul. Perhaps someone with a book could clarify.