Yes it is correct...dribble was started, stopped (via the catching), then dribbled again.

In the OP, there never was a stopped dribble/catching of the ball...it was interrupted by her motion of going back into the BC but never did the dribble come to an end.

Johnny Ringo, still waiting on that rule reference that says an interrupted dribble is an unintentional act. :rolleyes:

Methinks you are going to be waiting longer than a Duke student outside Cameron Indoor before a UNC game! :D

While I don't think you'll get a direct reference, it is at least implied in the interruped dribble rule itself.....the ball doesn't get a way from the dribbler on purpose (unless it comes alive!!!) An interrupted dribble is not when a player choses not to dribble the ball, it's when they can't dribble the ball.

I don't see anything in the rule that implies it.