If you are the R

[Back In The Saddle]

Okay, to summarize: Thinking for yourself = bad. Parroting what the loudest and most voluminous poster's think = good.

Thank goodness we got that sorted out.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle

Okay, to summarize: Thinking for yourself = bad. Parroting what the loudest and most voluminous poster's think = good.

Thank goodness we got that sorted out.

Yup, that's what different between this forum and the paid side of this site. Over here you'll hear about it when you write crap.

[rockyroad]

And I still say that no one has given me a good reason to NOT know when someone has 4 fouls...so I will continue being aware of that along with all the other stuff I try to be aware of.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by rockyroad

And I still say that no one has given me a good reason to NOT know when someone has 4 fouls...so I will continue being aware of that along with all the other stuff I try to be aware of.

EXACTLY!!!!!!! I have been working games the last few days, but this thread has still being entertaining. I tried to have as much knowledge about the key players and their foul situations and I did not call the game one time any different than I did when I did not know the information. And whatever I do must be noticed because I am working the Championship game in my tournament in the first year the assignor assigned it based on who he felt were his best officials rather than just geography (before they would allow the people that had the most travel leave earlier). My crew must be doing something right. Oh well, I guess this is just how the internet goes. If you do not do it my way, something is wrong with you.

Peace