The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 21, 2007, 09:00pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 162
bench, players talking during free throw

during a game is it just a violation if the opposing bench is talking shouting during a free throw. Or would it be a violation/warning and then a Tech? I saw a rebounder and the free throw shooter both talking trash before the shot.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 21, 2007, 10:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
It would have to be some pretty aggressive talking to count as disconcerting.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Dec 21, 2007, 10:28pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by lpbreeze
1)during a game is it just a violation if the opposing bench is talking shouting during a free throw. Or would it be a violation/warning and then a Tech?

2)I saw a rebounder and the free throw shooter both talking trash before the shot.
1) Yes, you can call a disconcertion violation if the FT is missed. If you felt that the yapping from the bench was also unsporting, you could add a "T" to the violation too.

2) Different situation. If you have two opponents trash-talking each other, call a double technical foul.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 05:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
1) Yes, you can call a disconcertion violation if the FT is missed. If you felt that the yapping from the bench was also unsporting, you could add a "T" to the violation too.

2) Different situation. If you have two opponents trash-talking each other, call a double technical foul.
Perfect JR...and wonderfully explained.

But, now in 2) we have a false double foul. The 2 College partners, on a crew of 3, want to administer this differently than (what they believe) are NFHS rules.

The H.S. official wants to clear the lanes and shoot whatever FT's were going to be shot.

Then the H.S. official wants to go to the AP arrow for a Throw-in opposite table.

The 2 College officials want to come up with something close to NCAA rules since they say the rules "make more since", in these situations.

Sooooo, the lane is cleared and the FT's are shot. Since the last FT was made. The crew gives the ball to the other team on the endline because of POE.

Who got it right...the H.S. official or the 2 College officials?
__________________
Dan Ivey
Tri-City Sports Officials Asso. (TCSOA)
Member since 1989
Richland, WA
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 05:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,281
No one got it right.

Point of Interruption. period. Play on with what ever was going to happen...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 06:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by RookieDude
Perfect JR...and wonderfully explained.

But, now in 2) we have a false double foul. The 2 College partners, on a crew of 3, want to administer this differently than (what they believe) are NFHS rules.

The H.S. official wants to clear the lanes and shoot whatever FT's were going to be shot.

Then the H.S. official wants to go to the AP arrow for a Throw-in opposite table.

The 2 College officials want to come up with something close to NCAA rules since they say the rules "make more since", in these situations.

Sooooo, the lane is cleared and the FT's are shot. Since the last FT was made. The crew gives the ball to the other team on the endline because of POE.

Who got it right...the H.S. official or the 2 College officials?


In FED, clear the lane and shoot the reminaing FT(s) for the personal foul. Then shoot the FTs for the T. Then give the tam not committing the T the ball at the division line.

In NCAA, clear the lane and shoot the FTs for the T. Then bring everyone back and continue the game with the FT(s) for the personal foul.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 06:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
In FED, clear the lane and shoot the reminaing FT(s) for the personal foul. Then shoot the FTs for the T. Then give the team not committing the T the ball at the division line.
Hmmm...double technical foul...which team didn't commit a T?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelvin green
No one got it right.

Point of Interruption. period. Play on with what ever was going to happen...
Correct.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 07:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 18,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef
Hmmm...double technical foul...which team didn't commit a T?
Sorry, I was answering Play 1. My mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 07:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mizzouah!
Posts: 352
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins
In FED, clear the lane and shoot the reminaing FT(s) for the personal foul. Then shoot the FTs for the T. Then give the tam not committing the T the ball at the division line.

In NCAA, clear the lane and shoot the FTs for the T. Then bring everyone back and continue the game with the FT(s) for the personal foul.

If its a double t, wouldn't we just go to the poi which was the free throw?

If it was a lane violation, wouldn't we re shoot the throw?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sat Dec 22, 2007, 09:09pm
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by RookieDude
The 2 College officials want to come up with something close to NCAA rules since they say the rules "make more since", in these situations.
Make more since when? It makes no difference whether NF or NCAA has made more rules since a certain date, all that counts is whose rule set is valid for this game.
__________________
Yom HaShoah
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 23, 2007, 12:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 486
Everything is administered in the order of occurance correct?

SO....
You had the foul that created the 2 FTs for Team A
Then you have the double Ts

Clear the lane, Team A shoot the 2 FTS
Then shoot the 2 Ts

Then it's POI and it would be Team B ball, correct?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Sun Dec 23, 2007, 01:48am
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coltdoggs
Everything is administered in the order of occurance correct?

SO....
You had the foul that created the 2 FTs for Team A
Then you have the double Ts

Clear the lane, Team A shoot the 2 FTS
Then shoot the 2 Ts

Then it's POI and it would be Team B ball, correct?
There's no FT's for any double foul, including a double technical foul. You go to the POI, which is the FT's for team A.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon Dec 24, 2007, 11:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Fishers, IN
Posts: 486
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
There's no FT's for any double foul, including a double technical foul. You go to the POI, which is the FT's for team A.
I stand corrected and now that I think about double fouls I have whistled in my time (non Ts)...this makes sense to me.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question regarding players switching on a free throw grizwald Basketball 6 Wed Dec 07, 2005 07:55pm
Noise from bench on free throw rafking Basketball 15 Mon Feb 23, 2004 06:30am
Talking to Players Ref Daddy Basketball 2 Sun Jan 25, 2004 02:03am
offensive team too many players on free throw lane ridavis13 Basketball 4 Sun Nov 16, 2003 05:58pm
Talking to Players & Coaches LepTalBldgs Basketball 7 Mon Oct 20, 2003 04:14pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1