![]() |
Quote:
If you're changing your normal officiating standards to call some "maybe-maybe-not-a-foul-contact" fouls that you haven't called to date, and you're doing so because of a disparate foul count, then you're officiating to that particular situation. Maybe BITS thinks that is good game management. I sureasheck don't. |
Quote:
I'm working a state semi-final game, 5 years ago at ECU's Minges Colesium. Team A is down 5 and the fouls are 4-0 in the opponent's favor entering the second quarter. I'm in the slot in front of Coach A. "The fouls are 4-0 in their favor." "I know, coach. They haven't fouled anyone yet." "Good point." If the fouls are out of balance, I'm not going hunting. But at the same time, I'm going to be aware so that I don't mistakenly pass on one that should be called. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I couldn't have said it better!! That's all I was really saying... nothing about attempting to even it up or fixing the count, just being aware for: 1. bonus purposes 2. ready with a response for the coaches complaints (NOT FIXING BECAUSE HE IS WHINNING) 3. I thought knowing the particulars (foul count NOT disparity, AP arrow, when 1 TO is remaining) were part of good game management. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Guys - what is so friggin difficult? If you and your partner(s) are calling the game the same for both sides, then the foul count is totally irrelevant to how you are going to call the next one, or the next, or the next, etc. - all the way until the end of the game. If you're calling it properly and there is a foul count "disparity", it just means one team is playing proper defense and the other team isn't. That's not your problem. You don't commit fouls, you just point them out to everyone when they occur. If you start calling it differently for one of the teams, or both of the teams due to the foul count, you are not doing your job properly. Period.
Denny Crane. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
My comment at the end was my opinion of the entire topic and had nothing to do with your question. Quote:
Myself? If Dan, Camron, and Chuck have the same philosophy I do concerning this, I believe I'll be able to sleep soundly tonight. |
Quote:
Consistency considered? yes A game not at the best? often Need to make adjustments? sometimes My point was that none of the above is directly and proportionately related to the foul count. Adjustments that you may need to make might make the foul count even worse. Picture this. Had a game a couple of years ago in our 9-10 league. There was a 10 year old kid who was a real stud in the post playing on 8 1/2 foot goals. Other team ran 2 or 3 at him every time he caught it in there, but had little success stopping him. This is a game with 5 minute quarters and a running clock and 2 or 3 guys fouled out. Yet, somehow, the game still managed to end in a tie. The big kid's coach complained later that we didn't call enough fouls. He said that there should have been several multiple fouls called. This is a guy coaching his 9 year old son who had formerly coached at every level up to small college. I asked how many multiples he had seen called at any level. No answer. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:45am. |