Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ref Ump Welsch
Not to be overly "protective" or "critical", this Wikipedia article seems like it was a genuine description. However, in academic circles, this article could be taken as suspect. As a college professor, I can tell you that Wikipedia is loathed big time. Matter of fact, we are even supposed to deduct points for people using Wikipedia as a source.
|
Why? I doubt its accuracy is any more suspect than many other web pages. In fact, I suspect it might be better than the average.
Tue Oct 30, 2007, 10:55am
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode
