Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by devdog69
What he meant to say, instead of being a smart@$$, was, no, it was a violation. Sometimes there are guys around here who spend way too much time here and don't realize that some of us have lives and don't read each and every post, so they end up putting up some smart@$$ response which has nothing to do with the question. JV is far enough up the ladder to expect them to know the rules, blow the violation and maybe they will learn the rule.
|
My comment was not a smartass remark. The fact is that I could not immediately find the post. I search through 6 weeks of posts so that I could find the original thread. Note the time between my first and second reply. I found the post and gave the link. The play was discussed for 15 days. I hate to see it drug out for another 15 days.
BTW, no, it is not a violation. There are 3 viable alternatives. There is no one interpretation.
|
I can live with any of the alternatives that any of you give except the one where you personally e-mail me and throw a hissy. You give a funny, sarcastic, response and everybody laughs, EXPCEPT: someone who asks an honest question and wants an honest answer. I was just saying that sometimes you/us regulars blow off the newbies questions because we have heard them before.
Sun Jan 27, 2002, 09:38pm
Hybrid Mode
