New Rule

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Old School

Case play where the clock didn't start or statrted late and the referee had a 5 second count on the player with the ball. We had a violation but the clock didn't start correctly. Referee could remove the 5 seconds off the clock because he had definite knowledge that at least 5 seconds should have ran off. If there's 2 seconds left on the clock, I can count that in my head. Whether the clock starts or stops on time is irrelevent to me from this point forward.

Game management: Is there a section in the book with this title. If not, there should be. I would have it in my rulebook.

Let me try again. Do you have a rulebook or casebook reference other than what you think should be in the rulebook? The reason you need a reference, is because the situation you are talking about is completely different. You can only take 5 seconds off the clock in that situation because there is something you are using as a specific procedure. And you still have no reference. Imagine that.

Peace

[just another ref]

Does anybody else think that Old School sometimes comes off like when Dana Carvey used to do his imitation of Ross Perot?

[rainmaker]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

Let me try again. Do you have a rulebook or casebook reference other than what you think should be in the rulebook?

You know, what we could do is to get the mods to put OS's signature line AT THE TOP of each post, instead of the bottom. That way, we could all just ignore it, instead of feeling like we need to keep making comments and corrections.