New Rule

[Scrapper1]

Originally Posted by Old School

Good point Mark, your logic makes perfect sense to me and i agree with you that this is wrong. In this thread alone, we've made some excellent points for rules changes.

But you completely missed Mark's entire point, which is that good officials call the rule correctly, even when they disagree with the rule. Mark doesn't think the technical foul penalty is fair; but he enforces it correctly, instead of inserting his own "judgment" or "doing what's right".

Although I don't know I'm wasting pixels on you. You're not a real ref and never will be.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

But you completely missed Mark's entire point, which is that good officials call the rule correctly, even when they disagree with the rule.

Good officials know the rule also. You can't call what you don't know(unless you're Old School).

[Old School]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

But you completely missed Mark's entire point, which is that good officials call the rule correctly, even when they disagree with the rule. Mark doesn't think the technical foul penalty is fair; but he enforces it correctly, instead of inserting his own "judgment" or "doing what's right".

Although I don't know I'm wasting pixels on you. You're not a real ref and never will be.

If you don't think i'm a real ref then quite talking to me.

[Mark Padgett]

Originally Posted by Old School

If you don't think i'm a real ref then quite talking to me.

I notice you didn't tell him to quit talking to you, you subtle rascal.