The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 10:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old School
I have seen HS plays where the defense just runs right underneath the offensive player and it be an offensive foul simply because the defense got there first.
You can't run underneath the offensive player and still have gotten there first.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Old School
That's got to be one of the dumbest rules in the Fed. code.
That's not the rule.

You need to revisit the definitions section of the NFHS rulebook, particularly the definition of Guarding, particularly "4.23.d. If the opponent is airborne, the guard must have obtained legal position before the opponent left the floor.."

For a small fee, and a few hours perusal, the NFHS can set you free from this ignorance.

Buy a rule book. Read it. Learn it. Live it.
__________________
I couldn't afford a cool signature, so I just got this one.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 11:47am
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimgolf
You can't run underneath the offensive player and still have gotten there first.

That's not the rule.

You need to revisit the definitions section of the NFHS rulebook, particularly the definition of Guarding, particularly "4.23.d. If the opponent is airborne, the guard must have obtained legal position before the opponent left the floor.."

For a small fee, and a few hours perusal, the NFHS can set you free from this ignorance.

Buy a rule book. Read it. Learn it. Live it.
Okay, you asked for it. This comment... Okay, here's the deal. Back when this rule was written, basketball was mainly played by slower Caucasian athletes. Now that the athletism and speed of the athlete has increased twofold, that's double the speed of when this rule was written. In order to tell if the defense got there first, we need instant replay. I'm looking for when his foot left the floor as opposed to when the defender got set. Almost impossible to do in this day and age. At best, you are guessing in HS if it is close. Go back and review that video that we discussed at great length.

http://www.sportstricities.com/sport...-8578135c.html

The NBA acknowledge the shortcomings here, where there is many. The ability for the referee to get this call right, the safety of the players involved, and the notion that running underneath a player about to score with the ball is considered good defensive strategy. NOT! Add everything up, we only need the offensive player to have started his final motion or movement to the basket. This will aid the referee to successfully make the right judgment call. Looking for when the offensive players feet left the floor as oppsed to the defenders feet getting set is ridiculous. Things are happening way too fast for me to adequately see all that. The defense can either go for the shot block or the ball, or get the hell out the way. Going for the block and causing a collision, is whacked!!!!

Last edited by Old School; Tue Jul 24, 2007 at 11:52am.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 12:01pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old School
Okay, you asked for it. This comment... Okay, here's the deal. Back when this rule was written, basketball was mainly played by slower Caucasian athletes. Now that the athletism and speed of the athlete has increased twofold, that's double the speed of when this rule was written. In order to tell if the defense got there first, we need instant replay. I'm looking for when his foot left the floor as opposed to when the defender got set. Almost impossible to do in this day and age. At best, you are guessing in HS if it is close. Go back and review that video that we discussed at great length.
The NBA acknowledge the shortcomings here, where there is many. The ability for the referee to get this call right, the safety of the players involved, and the notion that running underneath a player about to score with the ball is considered good defensive strategy. NOT! Add everything up, we only need the offensive player to have started his final motion or movement to the basket. This will aid the referee to successfully make the right judgment call. Looking for when the offensive players feet left the floor as oppsed to the defenders feet getting set is ridiculous. Things are happening way too fast for me to adequately see all that. The defense can either go for the shot block or the ball, or get the hell out the way. Going for the block and causing a collision, is whacked!!!!
could someone please post that link to the OS-English translation tool? I can't seem to find it.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 12:05pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
babelfish.altavista.com

For OS-related verbiage, I think you also need an officiating philosophy translator as well.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 12:04pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old School
Okay, you asked for it. This comment... Okay, here's the deal. Back when this rule was written, basketball was mainly played by slower Caucasian athletes. Now that the athletism and speed of the athlete has increased twofold, that's double the speed of when this rule was written.
I get it. We need separate rule books for the white players and the black players.

That might just be the absolute stoopidest thing ever posted on this forum. And considering the number of stoopid posts that you've made, that's sureashell saying something.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 12:17pm
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
I get it. We need separate rule books for the white players and the black players.

That might just be the absolute stoopidest thing ever posted on this forum. And considering the number of stoopid posts that you've made, that's sureashell saying something.
Now that's you putting your spin on it. I said "ATHLETES" are faster, stronger today. That includes, white, black, asian, mexican, chinese, japaneses, and the list goes on. Athletes are faster today then when that rule was written. We can barely referee a high school game now with just 2 officials. Fed rules have not kept up with the day and age we live in. We keep trying to force rules that where written 40, 50 years ago into todays athlete. The game was played completely different back when those rules where written. I doubt that very many people could dunk the ball when that rule was written. Change can be good sometimes JR. We should try to make it better instead of just excepting the way it is.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 12:34pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old School
We keep trying to force rules that where written 40, 50 years ago into todays athlete. The game was played completely different back when those rules where written.
Again, written with no real knowledge at all of rules-writing.

The rules--NFHS, NCAA & NBA-- have all been amended, altered, revised, etc. every single year going back 50 years. The rules have constantly changed, and are constantly changing, at all levels to keep pace with how the game is changing. If you'd ever read a damn rulebook in your life, you might have known that.

It's sadly apparent that your total knowledge of the rules was gained from watching television. It's even sadder that it doesn't stop you from posting about something that you know absolutely nothing about.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 04:42pm
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
It's sadly apparent that your total knowledge of the rules was gained from watching television.
No, from playing the games, being in the trenches.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 12:35pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old School
We should try to make it better instead of just excepting the way it is.
Accepting.

Please please please learn the language. You are frustrating me.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 12:39pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
It's like watching Larry the Cable Guy debate, well, anyone. You already know who's going to win, but the trainwreck itself is entertainment. Now, who's got the popcorn?
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 04:44pm
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee
Accepting.

Please please please learn the language. You are frustrating me.
Damn keyboard....
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 04:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,453
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old School
Damn keyboard....
Actually, you should be saying "damn brain".
__________________
Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 04:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old School
Damn keyboard....
Not bad, OS, not bad!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 04:50pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old School
Damn keyboard....
Shouldn't you say "Damn keybored"?
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jul 24, 2007, 12:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 944
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old School
Okay, here's the deal. Back when this rule was written, basketball was mainly played by slower Caucasian athletes. Now that the athletism and speed of the athlete has increased twofold, that's double the speed of when this rule was written.
Now we know. Old School is Jimmy the Greek.
__________________
I couldn't afford a cool signature, so I just got this one.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1