Court coverage diagram........

[dsimp8]

Does anyone have a court coverage diagram for 2 man and 3 man court coverage? I've looked over the internet and cannot find them. Thank you.

[SmokeEater]

I found this in another forum. 2 man on left side and 3 man on right side.

http://www.westsideref.com/westsider...y?opendocument

[JRutledge]

This might apply to a certain organization, but this is not the same coverage area (at least 3 Person) as the NF or CCA (Women's and Men's) uses.

Not all organizations use the same coverage areas.

Peace

[SmokeEater]

Most certainly you are correct JRut, but it does give some place to start for ideas.
Here is another version. http://home.officiating.com/sowb/images/court1.gif

Ensure you are using one that follows what your association uses. That is my disclaimer.
I assume no responsibility for providing false information. lol

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by SmokeEater

Most certainly you are correct JRut, but it does give some place to start for ideas.
Here is another version. http://home.officiating.com/sowb/images/court1.gif

Ensure you are using one that follows what your association uses. That is my disclaimer.
I assume no responsibility for providing false information. lol

If you want ideas, buy the literature that is already on the market. I am just pointing out that the reference shown does not reflect the sanctioned mechanics of the NF, CCA Men's and Women's mechanics.

Peace

[Splute]

Here is one that is done in power point with animation....
http://www.recserv.uiowa.edu/program...rals/court.swf

[Splute]

Originally Posted by Splute

Here is one that is done in power point with animation....
http://www.recserv.uiowa.edu/program...rals/court.swf

JRut,
I will go over the website I attached again, but it seemed to follow the guidelines I read in the NFHS Officials Manaul a few months back. I will compare them again to be sure. The primaries are the same as I learned in camp.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Splute

JRut,
I will go over the website I attached again, but it seemed to follow the guidelines I read in the NFHS Officials Manaul a few months back. I will compare them again to be sure. The primaries are the same as I learned in camp.

The problem with the program is it is not a very good diagram. Also in NF mechanics, there is no dual area anymore (Lead and Trail below FT line extended and within the 3 point line). They got rid of that about 4 to 5 years ago.

The point is if you want accurate mechanics diagrams; buy the books that are already in place. Looking for shortcuts does not work very well. And these mechanics at all do not reflect CCA Men's or CCA Women's mechanics.

Actually this is a better depiction of what the NF wants at least.

NF Coverage area

Just saying.

Peace

[Splute]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

The problem with the program is it is not a very good diagram. Also in NF mechanics, there is no dual area anymore (Lead and Trail below FT line extended and within the 3 point line). They got rid of that about 4 to 5 years ago.

The point is if you want accurate mechanics diagrams; buy the books that are already in place. Looking for shortcuts does not work very well. And these mechanics at all do not reflect CCA Men's or CCA Women's mechanics.

Just saying.

Peace

I see what you are saying on the "dual" coverage. In my mind it was Lead only coverage for the dual shading. I cannot argue with your points of buying the existing, sanctioned books and diagrams. However, some people learn and retain better with other visual aides. The transitioning slides, pregame and time out slides appear helpful, yet simplified.

I do not know any mechanics or rules outside of NFHS...... first year; lots to learn. Thanks for your detailed explanation.

[JRutledge]

He asked for a court diagram. There is an actual visual aid used in the book.

Also the OPer did not say anything about which level he was looking for. You do not have to be a certain year to have some knowledge those different levels. It is never too early to learn.

Peace