The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 08:46am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
You obviously do not work in education or in areas with a lot of smaller schools. There are many schools in our area that really can't afford 3 man crews. There are a couple that on the verge of closing down completely. I would really hate to see money earmarked for the education of all students being pulled into the fund to pay for 3 man crews instead of 2 man crews in BB.

However - I personally prefer the 3 man crew both for college and varsity HS - and have even worked the 3 man crew for the fee of 2 man crew at HS and MS levels. We have done this on holiday tournaments etc and pre-season scrimages in part to give less experienced officials a chance to familiarize themselves and get some practice with the 3 man crew after attending a camp. I agree that 3 man crews would be great and I don't know what the solution is - but some schools really can't afford this one.
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 10:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,910
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartrusepengui
You obviously do not work in education or in areas with a lot of smaller schools. There are many schools in our area that really can't afford 3 man crews. There are a couple that on the verge of closing down completely. I would really hate to see money earmarked for the education of all students being pulled into the fund to pay for 3 man crews instead of 2 man crews in BB.
I don't agree with this. Those small schools pack their gyms every night during basketball season. Paying another official for their home games isn't going to cause them to close their doors. If they want quality games with quality officiating, they need to find the money for 3 man crews.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 12:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
Many people don't agree who do not see how education is funded and how funding is constantly being cut back. I could really go off on a tangent on Ed funding BUT I do agree with OP that I would prefer 3 person crews but it's just not feasable where I am located. Each school sets own sub varsity fee schedule and conferences set varstiy fee schedule. Location and population are two other issues with gates etc. I am not sure where you are from but my sub varsity game fees range from $35 on the lowest end to $46.50 (ave. $41) for JV w/no mileage being paid. That is just for BB subvarsity and additional $1500 - $2500 increase. Other sports are also trying to get larger crews - FB, SB, BB etc. It just adds up and is hard to justify for AD's and Admin when the rest of the budget keeps getting cut.
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 01:34pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartrusepengui
Many people don't agree who do not see how education is funded and how funding is constantly being cut back.
This is just a little bit condescending. Many people disagree who DO know how education is funded and how funding is being cut back.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 01:41pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
Quote:
This is just a little bit condescending. Many people disagree who DO know how education is funded and how funding is being cut back.
Sorry to crush your feelings...... hope I didn't destroy your self-esteem .... but then again, it's difficult to find very many comments on this forum that are not condescending.
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 01:43pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartrusepengui
Sorry to crush your feelings...... hope I didn't destroy your self-esteem .... but then again, it's difficult to find very many comments on this forum that are not condescending.
As in....anyone who does not agree with you is wrong?
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 02:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
not wrong - it just was not my intention to have my "condescending" words crush anyone. I never stated that no one knew how education is funded. By that - I mean the majority of people do not know how funding formulas work and that each district/school does not receive equal funding - even equal per pupil funding - and that these formulas are different from state to state. It was not my intent to condenscendingly imply that people do not know that the funding originates with taxes. It was more with what happens after the taxes are collected and monies are being dispursed.
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 02:09pm
Adam's Avatar
Keeper of the HAMMER
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: MST
Posts: 27,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartrusepengui
Sorry to crush your feelings...... hope I didn't destroy your self-esteem .... but then again, it's difficult to find very many comments on this forum that are not condescending.
Don't worry, my feelings aren't crushed and my self-esteem isn't affected. Neither is so fragile as to be susceptible to condescention from someone I don't know personally.

I was just pointing out two things.

1. Many who disagree with you are informed in the matter.
2. Implying that those who disagree with you aren't informed is a bit condescending and not at all convincing.

Not necessarily in that order.
__________________
Sprinkles are for winners.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 02:20pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,579
Let us also put this in perspective. Some schools pay people that hardly do anything. I have worked football games where the chain crew working only the varsity game gets more money than the officials working both games (varsity and JV/sophomore). If schools stop trying to pay people that would do the job for next to nothing, then you might have more money for officials.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 10:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 504
Quote:
Originally Posted by chartrusepengui
You obviously do not work in education or in areas with a lot of smaller schools. There are many schools in our area that really can't afford 3 man crews. There are a couple that on the verge of closing down completely. I would really hate to see money earmarked for the education of all students being pulled into the fund to pay for 3 man crews instead of 2 man crews in BB.
I think if we wanted we could hijack this discussion on crash the board by talking about education funding.

Lets do some math at high school...figure 13 home games a season for 4 teams below varsity (13 x 4 = 52). Using the local fees paid to sub-varsity official ($30) the school has to pay a whopping $1,560 more a year to use three officials. If that is going to force a school to close down or pull money away from educating students the school should strongly consider dropping all athletics...look at the money they could use for education!
__________________
I didn't say it was your fault...I said I was going to blame you.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 12:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,910
Quote:
Originally Posted by LarryS
I think if we wanted we could hijack this discussion on crash the board by talking about education funding.

Lets do some math at high school...figure 13 home games a season for 4 teams below varsity (13 x 4 = 52). Using the local fees paid to sub-varsity official ($30) the school has to pay a whopping $1,560 more a year to use three officials. If that is going to force a school to close down or pull money away from educating students the school should strongly consider dropping all athletics...look at the money they could use for education!
I am an educator and I agree. Not having the money is a cop out at those small schools. They could find it if they had to. There's plenty of other places money is wasted.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 24, 2007, 12:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: WI
Posts: 825
Yeah, but I didn't want to get started on administrator salaries ...... :-)
__________________
When I want your opinion - I'll give it to you!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
We don't need no stinkin' new rules - or do we? Mark Padgett Basketball 61 Mon May 21, 2007 04:39pm
This guy gets it. Part 2. 26 Year Gap Basketball 0 Wed Dec 13, 2006 06:46pm
Need Some Help Part 2 FltEMTP Baseball 9 Wed Mar 23, 2005 04:12pm
Part 1 and Part 2 NFHS tests WindyCityBlue Baseball 28 Mon Nov 22, 2004 02:49pm
Socks? We don't need no stinkin socks!!!!!! sm_bbcoach Football 6 Mon Aug 30, 2004 03:54pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1