When "talking heads" are harshly criticized on the forum, you think:

Jurassic Referee · #23 (**permalink**) Tue Apr 10, 2007, 07:27am

Quote:

Originally Posted by tomegun

I do not think of Welmer as an official who favors one team or another. I also don't think of Welmer as a horrible official - but I sure don't see him as an elite official either.

You wanted to know what everyone thought was appropriate when it came to bashing officials. Well, I gave you my opinion of what I thought was appropriate. Your constant Welmer-bashing isn't appropriate in my opinion. It basically isn't any different than the fanboys that come here solely to dump on officials, also in my opinion.

You're certainly entitled to your opinions also.

That's not the answer that you were looking for, was it?

View Poll Results: When "talking heads" are harshly criticized on the forum, you think:
announcers ignorantly criticize officials, lack rules knowledge, and deserve it	41	59.42%
announcers create controversy, generate listeners and are a necessary evil	8	11.59%
criticizing announcers on an officials' forum protects the game of basketball	2	2.90%
criticizng "talking heads" is therapeutic, so who cares?	4	5.80%
dumping on another profession can make your profession look bad	10	14.49%
(Yawn) What was the question?	15	21.74%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Can "FOUL" be made "FAIR"?	PAT THE REF	Baseball	60	Sat Feb 24, 2007 09:01pm
Why "general" and "additional"?	Back In The Saddle	Basketball	1	Sat Oct 07, 2006 02:56pm
"Balk" or "Ball"	johnnyg08	Baseball	9	Fri Aug 18, 2006 08:26am