3.1 to 2.0?

[ATXCoach]

DC,

so in my lengthly hypothetical at the top of page 4 - the reviewing officials will/should rule that the game is over? correct?

Thanks

[DC_Ref12]

message redacted

[ATXCoach]

Originally Posted by DC_Ref12

message redacted

huh?? Are you saying that you are not going to give me your response to my hypothetical?

[DC_Ref12]

Originally Posted by ATXCoach

huh?? Are you saying that you are not going to give me your response to my hypothetical?

I started to try to, but it's 1:15 in the morning.

I'll try again after I get some sleep. You raise an interesting hypo, though.

[Adam]

This was a very simple play that required a very simple timing correction. The fact is, the ball wasn't saved and wouldn't have been reachable had someone tried. I've seen a lot of officials hit the whistle early on these plays. Since the clock didn't start, the officials have the opportunity to fix the clock to what it rightfully should have been had everything happened perfectly. Yes, that means they get to ignore the whistle in this case.

The official ruled an OOB violation, and even though he may have ruled it a bit early, that didn't matter in the end because of the timer's error. In the hypothetical, they would have had to stick with the erroneous violation because you can't correct violation calls by monitor. In that case, they would have had to go with the whistle.

Bottom line, this one wasn't that complicated, so we don't have to make it so.