The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Would you have T ed ? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/32547-would-you-have-t-ed.html)

grunewar Thu Mar 08, 2007 08:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Junker
...the lower level you work, the less unsportsmanlike conduct I'd put up with.

Junk - so, the HIGHER the level I work, the MORE unsportsmanlike conduct I should put up with? :confused:

JRutledge Thu Mar 08, 2007 09:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by grunewar
Junk - so, the HIGHER the level I work, the MORE unsportsmanlike conduct I should put up with? :confused:

He is basically saying that the lower the level, the less you tolerate. You may warn at the higher level because the participants will understand where you are coming from. The lower level coach or player has no little understanding where the line is. You have to ultimately have to decide where for yourself where that line is.

Peace

Old School Thu Mar 08, 2007 09:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells
Look, youv'e been known to use some pretty absurd hyperbole. This is probably in your top two. Utterly senseless.

I don't know if I would go that far, I think everyone gets the point but you. The official took a DIRECT insult, that's like a direct unprotected body shot in boxing. On the battlefield, that's like getting hit with a bullet and continuing to fight, paving the way for the others. By not giving the coach a T, it preserved the integrity of the game, and also the integrity for the C. A double win. I didn't mention that. This guy knocked down two birds with one stone, one no-call. He hits the C with a T and half the parents are going to be piss at him for getting that T so late in a 1 point game. The ones that saw the play would have really been upset b/c the kid didn't get foul, he just fell on the floor. In HS or college, that could've ended his career. It turned out that the team still lost, so preserving that T saved the coaches face with his supporters. Okay, I'll back down on the metal but we got to give him a stripe for that one, he earned it here.

I read somewhere out here where a poster said, sometimes a no call, is the best call! Being that the team still lost, the no-call becomes even bigger, imo. You see, it would not have changed anything which means it was the best thing to do. The game ended normally which shows the protection for the game, which is what everybody wanted to see happen. Calling the T would have sour the normal ending, tainted the winning teams victory, got the coaches all upset with you, now you got a confrontation you might have to deal with, and the coach never swore. You know we already talked about that thin skin of yours. If you going to call a T on the coach late in the game, make sure he earns it.

Adam Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:37pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
I don't know if I would go that far, I think everyone gets the point but you. The official took a DIRECT insult, that's like a direct unprotected body shot in boxing. On the battlefield, that's like getting hit with a bullet and continuing to fight, paving the way for the others.

No, I got the analogy, and words can't describe how inappropriate it is. Taking an insult is nothing like taking a bullet. To even compare the two is insulting to Medal of Honor winners, who did a hell of a lot more than take an insult to get that award.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
By not giving the coach a T, it preserved the integrity of the game, and also the integrity for the C. A double win. I didn't mention that.

You were better off not mentioning it, because it's bogus. He didn't call it because he didn't want to "decide the game." He allowed the coach to question his integrity without consequence.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
This guy knocked down two birds with one stone, one no-call. He hits the C with a T and half the parents are going to be piss at him for getting that T so late in a 1 point game. The ones that saw the play would have really been upset b/c the kid didn't get foul, he just fell on the floor. In HS or college, that could've ended his career.

Who cares? It's 10 year old boys. What would happen to a hs coach or a college coach is beyond irrelevant. Making that comment is beyond the pale, it's beyond an emotional outburst. It's a coach using an emotional moment as an excuse to verbally attack an official and accuse him of a personal bias. HS and college coaches know better, so he wouldn't have to worry about it at that level.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
It turned out that the team still lost, so preserving that T saved the coaches face with his supporters.

Again with the irrelevant facts. I don't care who wins or loses. The fact that you didn't give a T to a deserving coach doesn't become ok just because he loses the game anyway. I'ts a non sequiter.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
Okay, I'll back down on the metal but we got to give him a stripe for that one, he earned it here.

Only in so far as he learned a lesson on how he wants to handle it next time. I'm not going to say every official should call this a T ever time; but I will and every decent official I know personally would as well. The only experienced guys I know who won't are strictly working ms and ymca ball.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
I read somewhere out here where a poster said, sometimes a no call, is the best call!

Apples and oranges. That refers to situations where there's really no advantage on a contact situation. It has nothing at all to do with sportsmanship issues.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
Being that the team still lost, the no-call becomes even bigger, imo. You see, it would not have changed anything which means it was the best thing to do.

This is just inane. It doesn't mean crap. It only means the official wants to just get his check and go home. (Note, I'm not saying that's why the OP didn't make this call. I'm saying it's how OS's reasoning comes across.)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
The game ended normally which shows the protection for the game, which is what everybody wanted to see happen. Calling the T would have sour the normal ending, tainted the winning teams victory, got the coaches all upset with you, now you got a confrontation you might have to deal with, and the coach never swore.

No, the game didn't end normally. It ended with a coach having called a ref's integrity into question without consequence. And I don't give a rat's a$$ if he swore or not here; except that adding an F-bomb might make it flagrant.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
You know we already talked about that thin skin of yours. If you going to call a T on the coach late in the game, make sure he earns it.

It's not about me. It's not about thick or thin skin. It's about preserving the respect for the game and the officials. I couldn't care less what he thinks about me; he could think I've taken a bribe to throw the game to the other team for all I care; but he's not going to accuse me of cheating. He can make his point, and express his emotions, another way. If he can't, he'd best find another hobby.

And to paraphrase another ref on this board, he'll be done coaching before I'm done officiating.

Adam Thu Mar 08, 2007 10:41pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by grunewar
Junk - so, the HIGHER the level I work, the MORE unsportsmanlike conduct I should put up with? :confused:

Not necessarily, but sometimes. As Rut says, you can give warnings more effectively at that level. Also, the players have learned better sportsmanship by that level; for a couple of reasons. First of all, they've got more experience playing and watching Rasheed Wallace on TV is a smaller part of their greater basketball experience.
Second, the coaching is better, so the kids are taught by their coaches to cut it out. There are exceptions, but that's why we have the T.

Jurassic Referee Fri Mar 09, 2007 01:36am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
<font color = red>The official took a DIRECT insult</font>, that's like a direct unprotected body shot in boxing. On the battlefield, that's like getting hit with a bullet and continuing to fight, paving the way for the others. By not giving the coach a T, it preserved the integrity of the game, and also the integrity for the C. A double win. I didn't mention that. This guy knocked down two birds with one stone, one no-call. <font color = red>He hits the C with a T and half the parents are going to be piss at him for getting that T so late in a 1 point game. In HS or college, that could've ended his career.</font> It turned out that the team still lost, so preserving that T saved the coaches face with his supporters.

That again ties for the stoopidest post ever on this forum.

Not giving a deserved "T" doesn't preserve the integrity of anything. It just points out that an official has no balls. You <b>never</b> walk away from a direct insult.

That's another great statement. Don't call a deserved "T" because it might piss of the fans. And if you do piss off the fans, that's gonna end your career.

You've now gone past the point of "that's so dumb that you just have to laugh at it" and you're approaching "Good Lord, have you ever <b>seen</b> a damn basketball game, let alone officiated in one?".

canuckrefguy Fri Mar 09, 2007 01:36am

Whack.

End of story.

TRef21 Fri Mar 09, 2007 02:02am

I would have T'ed him. He made you look like a bad person in front of the packed gym. He disrespected and in youth sports that warrants a T since coaches are to be role models for the kids.

Scrapper1 Fri Mar 09, 2007 08:33am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
You've now gone past the point of "that's so dumb that you just have to laugh at it" and you're approaching "Good Lord, have you ever <b>seen</b> a damn basketball game, let alone officiated in one?".

Why does that stupid clown still have an account?!?!?! :mad:

Old School Fri Mar 09, 2007 08:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Snaqwells
No, I got the analogy, and words can't describe how inappropriate it is. Taking an insult is nothing like taking a bullet. To even compare the two is insulting to Medal of Honor winners, who did a hell of a lot more than take an insult to get that award.

We're on a bb forum, try to keep your focus on that! It was used as an example, not a matter of fact, some referees are wound way too tight!

Quote:

He didn't call it because he didn't want to "decide the game." He allowed the coach to question his integrity without consequence. Who cares? It's 10 year old boys. What would happen to a hs coach or a college coach is beyond irrelevant. Making that comment is beyond the pale, it's beyond an emotional outburst. It's a coach using an emotional moment as an excuse to verbally attack an official and accuse him of a personal bias. HS and college coaches know better, so he wouldn't have to worry about it at that level.
This is where I think you all need to take a step back. You have admitted that if this was a higher level game, you would have just given a warning, but since it's a lower level game, you call it differently. My position is why call a game 2 different ways, depending on what level you're working. If it's a technical at the lower level, then it's a technical at the higher level. Also, you are completely naive if you think this type of communications doesn't occur at the upper levels. It might even be worse at the upper levels because more is at stake. My position is to develop your tolerance level so that it's the same, no matter what lever you are working.

If you feel that this comment was a direct attack on your character. You need to get out more. Believe me, it gets much worse than that. Have you ever heard somebody say things in the heat of battle that they wish they didn't say? If you have ever coach a competitive game of bb, you will know that there are times when you say things out of emotion of the moment that you wish you didn't. And I just don't mean saying things that are out of line to the officials. BB is an emotional sport and as officials, we can't be emotional too, we can't get caught up in the heat of the moment. Being a good official requires balance in everything we do on the court, including dealing with emotions. I know that the majority of you disagree with this position. What this tells me is the majority of you will remain where you are at, because you think it's all about you. How did the one poster say it. "You let the coach insult YOU in front of everyone and get away with it. You just keep calling technicals everytime a coach says something to you that you don't like and see how far that takes you.

Jurassic Referee Fri Mar 09, 2007 09:15am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
You just keep calling technicals everytime a coach says something to you that you don't like and see how far that takes you.

Well, it'll probably take you out of rec league ball. Is that far enough?

Dan_ref Fri Mar 09, 2007 09:24am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
Why does that stupid clown still have an account?!?!?! :mad:

That's not nice. I don't think JR's stupid.

Adam Fri Mar 09, 2007 09:38am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
We're on a bb forum, try to keep your focus on that!

Keep your "examples" and analogies within the realm of appropriate, and we'll be fine.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
This is where I think you all need to take a step back. You have admitted that if this was a higher level game, you would have just given a warning, but since it's a lower level game, you call it differently.

Show me where someone who said they'd T here said they'd give a warning in HS. I didn't. I'd T this in a high school game as well and not lose any sleep over it.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
My position is why call a game 2 different ways, depending on what level you're working. If it's a technical at the lower level, then it's a technical at the higher level. Also, you are completely naive if you think this type of communications doesn't occur at the upper levels. It might even be worse at the upper levels because more is at stake.

No, you need to get out more. Coaches at upper levels know better and can control their emotions. It's true, it's true. I've seen it.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
BB is an emotional sport and as officials, we can't be emotional too, we can't get caught up in the heat of the moment.

I know you don't get this, but calling a T isn't an emotional experience. In fact, it's more often than not a very calming one for the coach involved.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
Being a good official requires balance in everything we do on the court, including dealing with emotions.

You don't have any clue what it takes to be a mediocre official, how are you going to tell someone how to be a good one?

Jurassic Referee Fri Mar 09, 2007 09:48am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
That's not nice. I don't think JR's stupid.

Am so....

http://www.gifs.net/other/crit_suc.gif

AFHusker Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:03am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
On the battlefield, that's like getting hit with a bullet and continuing to fight, paving the way for the others. By not giving the coach a T, it preserved the integrity of the game, and also the integrity for the C.

Comparing a sport to combat is a bad analogy, but if you are going to do it in this situation, it would be more like the enemy surrendering then pulling out a gun and shooting you when you go to detain him.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1