![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In the OP, it wasn't described if there was TC or not. Therefore, JRut and I answered they handled it correctly provided there was no team control. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I claim insanity . . . of course in my defense, now as opposed to 15 years ago - I'm still right!:p (well, maybe!) |
You are correct that team control fouls and POI are recent additions to the NFHS rules coming in with the 2005-06 season. However, the player control cancels a goal and the a double foul allows it to count rules have been around for quite awhile. I don't know the exact years, but it is more than 10.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BTW, does MTD still have the original poster? I thought it was revealed a couple years ago that he had it. :D |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Per this NFHS casebook play which was already cited above by Tanner: 4.19.8 SITUATION C: A1 drives for a try and jumps and releases the ball. Contact occurs between A1 and B1 after the release and before airborne shooter A1 returns to the floor. One official calls a blocking foul on B1 and the other official calls a charging foul on A1. The try is successful. RULING: Even though airborne shooter A1 committed a charging foul, it is not a player-control foul because the two fouls result in a double personal foul. The double foul does not cause the ball to become dead on the try and the goal is scored. Play is resumed at the point of interruption, which is a throw-in for Team B from anywhere along the end line. (4-36) |
opps! I'm sorry. if he misses AP arrow. I didn't read it correctly. I feel like an idiot.
Good looking out |
Regading situation #1 - how many officials have had this happen while working a game?
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22am. |