The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   Playoff Tech. (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/32166-playoff-tech.html)

tmp44 Sat Feb 24, 2007 04:18pm

Playoff Tech.
 
Girls District Playoff quarterfinal last night. Team A (#10 seed) is beating Team B (#2 seed) all night. 3 minutes left in the 3rd, Team A up 12. Team B is beginning to get frustrated because they're losing to a team that they shouldn't be losing to. I'm T and we have a tie-up in the corner, my side. I run in as I'm calling the jump ball. B1 ends up with the ball and, as I'm running in, A1 gives B1 what I can only describe as an "elbow shove" to the back. B1 turns around with a pissed off look in her face and the ball in her hands, but she was smart and didn't throw the ball at A1 although she looked like she might. I whacked A1. When the coach asked what the T was for, I told him that it was dead ball contact that, 1) had it been live ball, would have been a common foul or very possibly even an intentional, and 2) was unsportsmanlike towards B1.

Thoughts? One of the officials in my association who was at the game last night mentioned that, because it was a playoff game, maybe I should have held off on the T...anyone agree w/ that philosophy?

fonzzy07 Sat Feb 24, 2007 04:22pm

No who cares that it is a playoff game. She committed an act that deserved a T give her a T. A T is JUST BUISSNESS. Who cares that it is a playoff I just don't see what that has to do with it. Why should the person get special treatment.

Old School Sat Feb 24, 2007 04:57pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmp44
I'm T and we have a tie-up in the corner, my side. I run in as I'm calling the jump ball. B ends up with the ball and, as I'm running in, A1 gives B1 what I can only describe as an "elbow shove" to the back. B1 turns around with a pissed off look in her face and the ball in her hands, but she was smart and didn't throw the ball at A1 although she looked like she might. When the coach asked what the T was for, I told him that it was dead ball contact that, 1) had it been live ball, would have been a common foul

Thoughts? One of the officials in my association who was at the game last night mentioned that, because it was a playoff game, maybe I should have held off on the T...anyone agree w/ that philosophy?

Contact after the whistle has been blown should be ignored unless it is intentional or flagrant. From your description, it sounds like just a common foul, not intentional in nature. Remember you said if the ball was live it would be a common foul. Ignore it! You had a very competitive playoff game. Referee the game like you have been there before, not like you are new. How a player can get two elbows into the back of another player sounds to me like she was hustling and just got caught in an awkward position, related to trying to get the ball. This is apart of the game and you must learn and understand the difference. I understand what the other official was telling you. Don't go looking for problems. Problems of this nature will come to you. Calling intentional fouls that are not obvious to everyone in the gym in a girls game is over officiating. Let the players decide the game. When we're not notice is when we do our best. Girls play ball and they play very smart. Rarely do you see "intentional acts" in girls ball.

bob jenkins Sat Feb 24, 2007 05:00pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmp44
1) had it been live ball, would have been a common foul

I know you said "and very possibly intentional" -- you need to decide that *before* you call the T. IF you decide that it would have been a common foul, then you should have ignored the contact (well, you probalby still should have addressed it, but you shouldn't have called the foul).

tmp44 Sat Feb 24, 2007 05:02pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
Contact after the whistle has been blown should be ignored unless it is intentional or flagrant. From your description, it sounds like just a common foul, not intentional in nature. Remember you said if the ball was live it would be a common foul. Ignore it! You had a very competitive playoff game. Referee the game like you have been there before, not like you are new. How a player can get two elbows into the back of another player sounds to me like she was hustling and just got caught in an awkward position, related to trying to get the ball. This is apart of the game and you must learn and understand the difference. I understand what the other official was telling you. Don't go looking for problems. Problems of this nature will come to you. Calling intentional fouls that are not obvious to everyone in the gym in a girls game is over officiating. Let the players decide the game. When we're not notice is when we do our best. Girls play ball and they play very smart. Rarely do you see "intentional acts" in girls ball.

While I respect everyone's opinion on this board, if you are going to misquote me and then criticize me for it, keep your opinion to your self. If you would have read the OP, I told the coach it was definitely a common foul, and very possible an intentional foul. And it was not two pushes, it was one push, after the whistle, that had nothing to do with her being in an awkward position and everything about her pushing the other player.

Oh, and by the way, if you're going to actually quote me, why don't you quote the entire thing? Or are you afraid that people will disagree with you if you do?

tmp44 Sat Feb 24, 2007 05:07pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by bob jenkins
I know you said "and very possibly intentional" -- you need to decide that *before* you call the T. IF you decide that it would have been a common foul, then you should have ignored the contact (well, you probalby still should have addressed it, but you shouldn't have called the foul).

Bob,

I don't disagree, but it was honestly the reaction of the girl who got pushed that led me to the technical. if she throws the ball in retaliation, there is no way I can go to her coach without also having a technical on the girl who pushed her. And it would have been enough of an elapse of time where a simultaneous techincal would not have been possible.

Old School Sat Feb 24, 2007 05:31pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmp44
Bob,

I don't disagree, but it was honestly the reaction of the girl who got pushed that led me to the technical. if she throws the ball in retaliation, there is no way I can go to her coach without also having a technical on the girl who pushed her. And it would have been enough of an elapse of time where a simultaneous techincal would not have been possible.

What did you just say? The reaction of the other player that led you to call a technical foul!!! How the hell did you get a playoff game? Now, if the girl retaliates by throwing the ball at the opponent. Now you can step up and call a double technical!!!! Do you know where the balls going afterwards if you would have called a DT?

blindmanwalking Sat Feb 24, 2007 05:38pm

If it was severe enough for a call, you made the right one. Trust your judgement.

TimTaylor Sat Feb 24, 2007 05:48pm

tmp44,

From your OP it sounds like the push was a deliberate act on the part of A1, and if so it qualifies as intentional on that basis alone. I have no problem with your T in this instance. IMHO it's better to stop this crap immediately than to let it fester & possibly explode into something worse later on. Good job getting in there & keeping it from escalating!

Time2Ref Sat Feb 24, 2007 07:49pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by tmp44
Thoughts? One of the officials in my association who was at the game last night mentioned that, because it was a playoff game, maybe I should have held off on the T...anyone agree w/ that philosophy?

Game getting out of control. You had to get things in control. You can't let one team start taking cheap shots. It only escalates from there. That would make for a very ugly 4th quarter.

You were there. You got things under control. You did the right thing.

Terrapins Fan Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:37pm

Old School said-
Quote:

1)Calling intentional fouls that are not obvious to everyone in the gym in a girls game is over officiating.
2)Let the players decide the game.
3)When we're not notice is when we do our best.
4)Girls play ball and they play very smart. Rarely do you see "intentional acts" in girls ball.
I disagree with pretty much EVERYTHING you said here.
1)so we should worry about what the fans see?
2) agreed
3)Outright lie. We always get noticed no matter what we do, half the fans in the gym are yelling about something.
4) do you ref girls? If a girls gets pushed or shoved, you better watch the play at the other end, because I have heard the girls say "that b!tch isn't getting away with that" I have seen a girl get foulded on a lay up and turn and push the girl who fouled her.

Girls are way worse at retaliation.

K-Bach Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:51pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old School
Contact after the whistle has been blown should be ignored unless it is intentional or flagrant.


Does this mean you only call intentional or flagrant technical fouls? This must be some new form of game management -- call no dead ball contact until the game is beyond control.

I'll think I'll try it!:D

MJT Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:08pm

tmp44, I think when you see the situation occur you know if it warrants a T or not and that judgement is usually correct. I have only had one T on a player in the past 4 years and it was a flailing elbow/armswing just after I called a foul against a player who just contacted the player I T'd up. Like I said, when I saw it, I knew it was a T. It would have been if it was in a 7th grade game or a state championship game.

Adam Sat Feb 24, 2007 11:28pm

I had two dead ball contact T's this season in my games. My partner called one in a varsity girls game after a held ball when one of the participants threw an elbow before getting off the floor.
My other one was a 7th grade girls game, girl got fouled pretty hard. We had the whistle immediately, but I as soon as I'd closed in about two steps the fouled girl retaliated with a solid shove. Easy T. Her coach didn't seem to agree, but managed to keep it to himself mostly.

bob jenkins Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:40am

Quote:

Originally Posted by K-Bach
This must be some new form of game management -- call no dead ball contact until the game is beyond control.

I'll think I'll try it!:D

You should try it, because it's the rule. See 4-19-1 Note.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1