Please tell me where you officiate. I want to be sure I don't have any relatives or friends in your state that can possibly end up in a game where you are working. Why not give people a chance to do what?!? Permanently injure a kid? This isn't just bad judgement on an alleged adult's part. It's CRIMINAL abuse!!!!

Although we may live in a litigious society, it's doubtful there's a basis for legal action, at least meaningful action. How about an 'enjoyment obstruction' theory? Judge---summary judgment for the defendant and awarded attorney fees.

Although, Old School, I understand your desire to give people a chance, a warning, in my opinion, would be inapropriate given the safety concern and considering that the perpetrator was an adult.

In regards to the wife requesting to meet with the official. Whoever fielded this request should have immediately told her---NO.

How about a meeting with the parents of the FT shooter?

God help the guy who shines one of those at my kid. God help me afterwards.

Now, now Ignats! You wouldn't want to embarrass anybody!

Well, that's both a redundant statement and an easily misinterpreted abuse of "simple" as an adjective. Did you mean "easy to understand" or "unlearned, as in ignorant," or perhaps "lacking mental acuteness or sense."

Truly, the easiest to understand is often the easiest, as is being ignorant. However, I find that lacking sense takes a great deal of effort.

You forget, as long as your consistent in your ignorance, you'll do fine. Old School might even assign you some of those career-enhancing YMCA games.

OS/JMO-This is insanity.

Can't stop laughing.......can't breathe......

Why? Do You breathe thru your kneecap?:D

Not sure I understand where I officiate has anything to do with this. My point is; no one was injured and there's no telling how long he was doing this b4 someone mentioned it. So if the parent was doing this and nobody got hurt. Telling him not to do it again is reasonable, at least to me it's reasonable. You must also tell him that it is illegal at any basketball game because he simply may not know. Aren't these the same lasers they use in some rock concerts? If they are, I haven't heard of anybody's eyes being put out here because of this. Maybe these parents are thinking the same thing. To me, this falls in the same category as artificial noise makers, or other devices used at the game to try and get an advantage.

Give the person the benefit of the doubt. Now that you have informed him that it is illegal. If he does it again, it's out and you got more people to help ensure it doesn't happen again. Jumping to the extreme like what was done put everybody on the brink. You took away any chance for the parent to not lose face and say, I didn't know and will never do it again. This is a good result too, even though nobody here will acknowledge it. Instead you choose the no other way option and now you got the worse coming at you. Now, the incident is not over. Several days later and you're still dealing with it. Your job is to officiate the game, not to police the event.

Not everyone keeps their genitals in the same place, Captain.

These are the same laser pointers used in classrooms and business meetings; the ones that come with warnings not to shine them in the eyes of anyone. It's not about the eyes being put out, it's about the long term damage. They're not just illegal, they're dangerous.

Where you officiate is relevant only in as much as none of us want our kids put in danger because some official wants to "give people a chance."

That sums it up quite nicely for anyone that might still be wondering what way to go.

One one side you have the opinion of <b>officials</b>. On the opposite side you have the opinion of <b>Old School</b>. Make your choice.

EXACTLY! Thank you, Snaq.