The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   NCAA Mens Kick Ball Rule Clarification Needed (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/31079-ncaa-mens-kick-ball-rule-clarification-needed.html)

Dan_ref Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:05am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
Unless my education was extremely lacking, 14 = 14.0 and 15 = 15.0. So stating 14 is equivalent to stating 14.0. No?


No.

Google "significant digits" (you should have learned this in HS science class btw...). But the short answer is 14.0 states we care about tenths (seconds, meters, whatever) because we are able to know the value of the tenths. 14 states we are not able to know the value of the tenths so we go out of our way to ignore them.

So the way the rules under discussion are worded we are not to consider 10ths at all.

Scrapper1 Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:36am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
Quote:

Originally Posted by me
So stating 14 is equivalent to stating 14.0. No?

No.

So you're telling me that $14 is different from $14.00? If the pricetag says "$14" and you give the checkout girl $14.00, you expect to get change?

Quote:

Google "significant digits" (you should have learned this in HS science class btw...).
I did, but I readily admit that I'd forgotten all about significant digits. But from what I read on Google, and what I remember from HS science class, the significant digits to the right of the decimal point -- which are not followed by non-zero digits -- do not change the value of the number.

I understand your point, but I doubt the rulemakers were considering significant digits when they re-wrote the rule this year. I think what they meant was if the shot clock "displays" 14 seconds or less, reset it. But I disagree with you if you want to say that's what the rule actually says now.

Raymond Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:39am

2-14.6f. When an intentionally kicked ball occurs with 14 seconds or less remaining, set to 15 seconds

2-14.7Stop the timing device and continue time without a reset when play begins under the following circumstances:
b. When an intentionally kicked ball occurs with 15 seconds or more
remaining;

Men's Report...Last season, a rule change was implemented for an intentionally kicked ball that did not require the reset of the shot clock when it showed more than 15 seconds remaining. When 15 or fewer seconds remained, the shot clock was set to 15. To improve its application, the rule now states that when 14 or fewer seconds remain on the shot clock, it will be set to 15 seconds. Furthermore, when the intentional kick occurs with 15 or more seconds, there shall be no reset of the shot clock.


Nowhere in the NCAA rulebook is there mention of 10th's or 100ths of second in reference to the shot clock. If you see 14 reset it to 15, if says 15 or higher, don't reset it.

Please, do not purposely clog a drain just to show off your plumbing skills.

Dan_ref Mon Jan 22, 2007 10:53am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
So you're telling me that $14 is different from $14.00? If the pricetag says "$14" and you give the checkout girl $14.00, you expect to get change?

Don't be an ***. Our money system is accurate to 2 digits simply because that's the smallest coin the government mints. The "accuracy" of money is completely arbitrary. If the government wanted to mint coins that are worth tenths of cents (kinda small, maybe put your picture on it?) then it would be accurate to that value. Of course electronic trading can give change of very small values...but again it's irrelevant because money is not something we measure in a physical sense. As time is.

Getting back to the thread, shot clocks are accurate to units, ie any measurement smaller than that is not valid. That is a consequence of the fact that 10ths are not available to us and we cannot know where between the integer values the timing device is.

As for where the significant digits occur - if this concept was limited to decimals only it would be called significant decimals, not significant digits.

Do you think that every measurement is accurate to tenths of units or better?

Scrapper1 Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:07am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
Don't be an ***.

It's what I do. :shrug: :)

Quote:

Our money system is accurate to 2 digits simply because that's the smallest coin the government mints. The "accuracy" of money is completely arbitrary.
Whatever the reason, arbitrary or not, you said that 14 does not equal 14.0 and I just gave you a concrete example to the contrary. Sorry if it's not convenient.

Quote:

Getting back to the thread, shot clocks are accurate to units, ie any measurement smaller than that is not valid.
What does that even mean, "not valid"? They don't exist? Or we simply don't care about them? Because I agree that we don't care about them, as I've said. And I think that the rulemakers don't care about them, as I've said. But the shot clock is measuring them, whether they are displayed or not. For that reason, I think the rule should read "If the shot clock displays 14 seconds or less. . .". As I've said.

Quote:

Do you think that every measurement is accurate to tenths of units or better?
I don't have any idea whatsoever.

Dan_ref Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:25am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
It's what I do. :shrug: :)

Whatever the reason, arbitrary or not, you said that 14 does not equal 14.0 and I just gave you a concrete example to the contrary. Sorry if it's not convenient.

It's not inconvenient. It's improperly using the practices for measuring phyisical things (time and distance) to measure a non-physical thing (ie the value of money). You may as well say 14 seconds is equivalent to 14 dollars. Makes no sense.
Quote:


What does that even mean, "not valid"? They don't exist? Or we simply don't care about them? Because I agree that we don't care about them, as I've said. And I think that the rulemakers don't care about them, as I've said. But the shot clock is measuring them...
Wrong.

The shot clock is certainly not guaranteed to "measure" anything between 14 and 15. Surely the shot clock exists thru the time between 15 seconds and 14 seconds (as we do) but you have no standing to say the shot clock "measures" that time. And even if it did actually "measure" that time, how do we know what the measurement is? We don't, because 10ths of seconds are not available to us. IOW they are not valid for use in our measurement.

Scrapper1 Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:57am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
It's not inconvenient.

I agree.

Quote:

It's improperly using the practices for measuring phyisical things (time and distance) to measure a non-physical thing (ie the value of money). You may as well say 14 seconds is equivalent to 14 dollars. Makes no sense.
I disagree. Exactly 14 is equivalent to exactly 14.0. 14 dollars is equivalent to 14.0 dollars. Exactly 14 seconds is equivalent to exactly 14.0 seconds. It is the only sensible thing in this thread.

This whole discussion would go away if the rule simply said "If the shot clock displays 14 seconds or less, reset it to 15".

Dan_ref Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
I agree.


I disagree. Exactly 14 is equivalent to exactly 14.0. 14 dollars is equivalent to 14.0 dollars. Exactly 14 seconds is equivalent to exactly 14.0 seconds. It is the only sensible thing in this thread.

This whole discussion would go away if the rule simply said "If the shot clock displays 14 seconds or less, reset it to 15".

You have your head so far up your...errr....let's say you have your head so far into the weeds that you're concerned with making cute debating style points instead of hearing my message.

I'll try 1 more time then I'll give up.

The shot clock does not display tenths of seconds and we have no way of knowing how it passes the time from 15 seconds to 14 seconds. And I mean that in a very real sense. For this very reason we have absolutely no standing to come to any conclusion on the measurement of time between 15 and 14. With me so far? Or do you want to stop to question what I mean by "weeds"?

This idea is wrapped up neatly in a measuring technique that uses the concept of significant digits. There are ways to define what the accuracy of a measurement is, one way is to write the number that includes however many decimal places you know to be realiably measured*. When you say 14 you are saying it could be 14.0, 14.1, 14.2....or maybe even 13.9. When you say 14.0 you mean 14.0 - not 14.1 or 13.9. IOW (and I know this is gonna be tough so maybe read it 2 or 3 times...) 14 is NOT equivalent to 14.0.

See? 14 could be 14.1

14.0 could NOT be 14.1.

Since you admit you haven't thought about this since HS and you still to this day have no idea how it works I can understand why you are confused. But (by convention and practice) 14 seconds is not the same as 14.0 seconds.

* Does not have to be decimals - when Micky D says they sold billions and billions, do you think they have the exact number sold down to a single burger?

Scrapper1 Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:42pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
you're concerned with making cute debating style points instead of hearing my message.

I admit, I'm trying to stay light-hearted in the face of being called an ***. But I'm not being cute. I honestly don't care what the convention is. Exactly 14 seconds equals exactly 14.0 seconds. That's the bottom line. To deny that is to make mathematics non-sensical. To say that you don't care about extra decimal places is a far cry from saying that extra decimal places don't change the value of a given number. Let's say we time a runner in a sprint and our stopwatch measures to hundredths of a second. We time him at 9.85 seconds. I understand that we don't care about whatever extra thousandths he took to cross the line. But that doesn't mean that 9.85 actually equals the 9.851 that would've been measured on a slightly more accurate stopwatch.

Quote:

For this very reason we have absolutely no standing to come to any conclusion on the measurement of time between 15 and 14.
Maybe so. But we can come to the conclusion that there are 14 seconds or more remaining.

Quote:

When you say 14 you are saying it could be 14.0, 14.1, 14.2....or maybe even 13.9.
Jeez, I don't think I'm saying that at all!! When I say "there's 14 on the clock", I'm saying that I see "14" displayed. I'm not making any comment on 14.1 or 14.2 or whatever.

Quote:

when Micky D says they sold billions and billions, do you think they have the exact number sold down to a single burger?
No. But if they did have it down to a single burger -- say, 324,571,609,212 -- I bet that's the same as 324,571,609,212.0 burgers.

Dan_ref Mon Jan 22, 2007 01:05pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrapper1
I admit, I'm trying to stay light-hearted in the face of being called an ***. But I'm not being cute. I honestly don't care what the convention is.

Hmmm...that's quite a bit me like saying that you shouldn't be insulted by being called an ***, I don't care what the convention is regarding the language.
Quote:

Exactly 14 seconds equals exactly 14.0 seconds. That's the bottom line. To deny that is to make mathematics non-sensical.
There's your problem. When we're discussing measurments there is no such thing as EXACTLY 14 seconds. As I noted, 14 seconds might be 14.1 second, or 13.9 seconds. 14.0 seconds, OTOH, cannot be 14.1 seconds. Untill you see this it's useless to continue
Quote:

To say that you don't care about extra decimal places is a far cry from saying that extra decimal places don't change the value of a given number. Let's say we time a runner in a sprint and our stopwatch measures to hundredths of a second. We time him at 9.85 seconds. I understand that we don't care about whatever extra thousandths he took to cross the line. But that doesn't mean that 9.85 actually equals the 9.851 that would've been measured on a slightly more accurate stopwatch.
gack.

Now listen closely...I'm gonna try and remain as calm as is humanly possible...

BUT WE F'ING DON'T HAVE A MORE ACCURATE F'ING STOPWATCH!!!!!!

OK, I feel better now....
Quote:


Maybe so. But we can come to the conclusion that there are 14 seconds or more remaining.
Really? And how do you know there are not 13.9 seconds remaining? Certanly 13.9 is much closer to 14 than 14.5 is.
Quote:


Jeez, I don't think I'm saying that at all!! When I say "there's 14 on the clock", I'm saying that I see "14" displayed. I'm not making any comment on 14.1 or 14.2 or whatever.
Yes you are. Remember this gem?

Quote:

So what happens if the kicked ball occurs with more than 14.0 seconds but less than 15.0 seconds remaining? Do we reset or not?
And finally, and I do mean finally...
Quote:


No. But if they did have it down to a single burger -- say, 324,571,609,212 -- I bet that's the same as 324,571,609,212.0 burgers.
You can bet as much as you like accurate to thousanths of cents but you would be wrong. Simply beacuse the zero in the decimal point of your second number means there's a possibility that tenths of a burger were sold but we don't know what that fraction is in your first number.

They MIGHT be the same. OTOH they might NOT be the same. Not enough information in the first number to conclude.

Scrapper1 Mon Jan 22, 2007 02:22pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dan_ref
When we're discussing measurments there is no such thing as EXACTLY 14 seconds.

Well, you said you were done and that's just as well; because we're clearly talking at cross-purposes. There clearly is such a thing as exactly 14 seconds. There are very precise definitions of what a second is. You add the caveat, "when we're discussing measurements". And that must make a difference, but for the life of me I don't see what it is.

There is obviously time that passes between the point at which a clock shows 15 and the point at which the clock subsequently shows 14. This is undeniable, regardless of how many significant digits you want to include. The kicked ball rule doesn't tell us what to do during that time. This is also undeniable. The rule would be clearer if it read, "If the shot clock displays 14 seconds or less. . ." This is the one and only point that I really wanted to make in this whole thread.

So I'll be done now, too. (That's "too" with three significant letters. :) )

Jurassic Referee Mon Jan 22, 2007 02:38pm

http://www.forumspile.com/Stop-Dear_God.jpg

SmokeEater Mon Jan 22, 2007 03:22pm

Definative measurements (14.0) require definitive measuring devices (not possible with shot clocks as we know them). If a Stop Watch was used as a timer then stopping the device at exactly 14.0 would IMHO be equal to 14 otherwise how could you possibly tell.

mtbabo Wed Jan 24, 2007 03:40pm

Kick Ball - Shot Clock
 
Additional information, "Last season, a rule change was implemented that did
not require the reset of the shot clock if it showed 15 or more seconds
remaining. If 15 or fewer seconds remained, the shot clock was set to 15.
To avoid confusion, the rule will now state that if 14 or fewer seconds
remain on the shot clock, it will be set to 15 seconds." This is found or
BR15 (NCAA Rules Book). - Donnie


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:52am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1