HawkeyeCubP |
Fri Jan 12, 2007 08:23pm |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
Quote:
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=alt2 style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset">Originally Posted by Camron Rust
A player who is backpeddling very likely establishes LGP in the process. Are they facing the opponent? Are they in the path? Do they ever have both feet on the floor at the same time? The answer is highly likely a yes to all three. So, LGP is it.
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Oh really?
How about:
SECTION 23 GUARDING<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p>
ART. 1 . . . Guarding is the act of legally placing the body in the path of an offensive opponent.
LGP is only relevant if there is contact.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
If the guard is not in their path at the time of contact, that means the guard is moving into the opponent and does not have LGP.
|
Conceded that "being in the path" is a requirement of "gaurding," which is a requirement of LGP.
But simply because a gaurd is not in the path of an offensive player does not automatically mean the gaurd is moving into the opponent and is responsible for the illegal contact. Take, for instance, a stationary offensive player who fouls a gaurd by pushing, then runs the other way to receive a pass. In the OP, yes, but not universally.
|