![]() |
|
|||
Rules Question from a basketball coach...
Two things happened in a big game for us the other night. (I am a Head Boys Basketball Coach in Texas).
Scenario One: We get a delay of game warning for touching the ball coming out of the net after we scored. Later on, we do it again and get the technical called on us. Question One: Is this delay of game indirect technical also a personal foul on the player who touched the ball? Scenario Two: We are up with little time on the clock, we get a steal, go in for a lay up and get an intentional foul called for a push from behind. Not flagrant, but intentional. We MADE the shot. Question Two: What is the correct course of action on this call? |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
The basket counts and the player who was fouled is awarded 2FTs with no one on the lane. (Yes, that is TWO FTs that are awarded even though the goal was scored.) Following the FTs the offended team is awarded the ball OOB at the nearest spot to the location of the foul. The opponent is charged with one personal foul to the player who fouled and it counts as one team foul towards the opponent reaching the bonus. |
|
|||
1. (Oops! NR is right).
2. Assuming the official ruled the player fouled as in the act of shooting (and it sounds like that may not have happened), the shot should count, the player gets the 2 free throws, and your team gets the ball for a throw in nearest the spot of the foul. If the player was ruled to not have been in the act of shooting, its 2 shots and the ball. So what happened? Last edited by Texas Aggie; Mon Dec 25, 2006 at 11:29pm. |
|
|||
Thank you sir, and we in Texas do use the NFHS rule book.
The first one, they got correct, even though the opposing coach begged to differ. The second one, they gave us THREE free throws and the ball. They seemed confused for some reason. Not sure if they were giving us the "and 1" and then the two free throws or what? Did not effect the outcome so no harm done. |
|
|||
Quote:
Good point on #2. The scoring of the goal does depend upon the decision of the official as to whether the fouled player was in the act of shooting at the time of the foul. |
|
|||
Quote:
Trust me on this one. It is NOT an indirect technical foul at all. Under NFHS rules the only person on a team who can be charged with an indirect technical foul is the Head Coach. The offense you described is a TEAM technical foul. There is a nice chart on page 73 of the rules book, which you can consult. Also, did the officials credit the basket on your play in addition to incorrectly giving you three FTs or did they merely give you the FTs? Plus did they make the kid who was fouled shoot the FTs or did they let you pick anyone? |
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Yom HaShoah |
|
|||
He was ruled in the act of shooting and they did count the bucket whixh was correct. We shot two free throws, they talked for a long time, and then we shot ANOTHER one, and then got the ball OOB!
I know we are all posting at the same time, so just to be clear... THE INDIRECT DOES NOT GO TOWARDS DQ, CORRECT!? Sorry, I keep calling it indirect because that is what they were saying, not because I don't believe you! TEAM TECHNICAL! |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() BTW where did the officials award your team the throw-in -- on the end line near the basket or out a midcourt? Last edited by Nevadaref; Mon Dec 25, 2006 at 11:45pm. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USA Basketball Rules & Mechanics | Luis | Basketball | 5 | Thu Feb 02, 2006 12:16am |
Basketball Rules Exam I | flaref0812 | Basketball | 10 | Fri Oct 21, 2005 05:19am |
basketball rules questions | maine wildman | Basketball | 1 | Wed Dec 22, 2004 12:54pm |
Basketball rules | tgl | Basketball | 16 | Tue Mar 23, 2004 07:13am |
Rules for three on three basketball | kletis55 | Basketball | 2 | Mon Jul 17, 2000 11:58am |