![]() |
|
|||
Throw-in ends
Looking closely at the wording in Rule 4, Rule 7, and Rule 9 I think there is something we missed as we discussed the "unannounced rule change) ...
They changed the wording in 4-42-5 (as aptly pointed out in previous thread) that states throw-in ends when ball is touched by player inbounds or out of bounds... This would change the way we administer the AP arrow... Previous to that change if Team A is throwing the ball in and it hit B (not A since it was a violation on A) who was standing OOB it was a violation on Team A because the rule stated it had to be touched by player inbounds... Team loses their throw-in because B touched the ball while being OOB.... If you did not think it was a violation on B because you ruled the ball being caused to go OOB by B (which I would think is an incorrect ruling since the ball still did not go inbounds) then the scenario would look like this Team A throws ball in, and B touches it OOB (first to touch). By definition the throw-in had not ended. So arrow is not switched yet and the new throw-in by A still with arrow pointing A's direction--- Now there is a foul by either a or B on the throw-in, we penalize the foul and A keeps the arrow after making one throw-in already We need to make sure we look at the whole context as to why the rule wording was changed They just carried that line over from Rule 4 to Rule 7 and 9... We cant read one line in a vaccuum. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
All's well that ends well... | ditttoo | Basketball | 4 | Thu Jun 22, 2006 02:52pm |
throw in ends | mdray | Basketball | 6 | Tue May 23, 2006 09:54am |
Where Professionalism Ends.....???? | WooPigSooie | Basketball | 58 | Wed Mar 08, 2006 08:38am |
warming up at both ends? | johnfox | Basketball | 8 | Wed Jan 25, 2006 10:33am |
Untimed down or change ends?? | BoBo | Football | 7 | Tue Sep 13, 2005 03:29pm |