Which is spot nearest to the intentional foul.

Whoa, there, Buckaroo!! You can't just sneak in a six-word response in the middle of a thread when no one's seen or heard from you in months!! How the heck are you any way??

Nope.

The POI is the first of the 2 FT's for the intentional foul. The throw-in by team A at the spot closest to the intentional foul is part of the penalty for the intentional foul. NFHS rule 4-36-2(b). - <i>"Play shall be resumed by.....a free throw....when the stoppage occurred during this activity <b>or if a team is entitled to such</b>".</i> Team A was entitled to A1's 2 FT's, so the POI is the first of those 2 FT's..

I would have to go with No throws on double T, give team A the two merited free throws from the intentional and give team A ball on the end line, if that is closest spot to where intentional foul occurred!

I would agree with JR. POI is when A1 receives the ball for the 1st of the 2 free throws.

Ahhhh yes, wasn't thinking clearly. Thanks for the correction JR.

So A1's free throws are no longer shot with the lane cleared?

No, I believe they are. I just misapplied what the POI was, the player will attempt their throws with no one in the lane. Then the throw-in will be spot nearest to the intentional foul. Re-read JR's post, he states it pretty good.

Oh, now I see what JR's point was. Someone stated that POI was the throw-in, when actually the POI is the 1st of 2 free throws, which would then be followed by Team A's throw-in.

Yup, and that's exactly why I asked the question yesterday...... if B1's foul wasn't intentional but was still on A1 while he was shooting, what would you do? In that case, the POI after the double "T" that followed would still be the first of 2 free throws, but you <b>would</b> line the players up on the lanes in that case.

I'll take claim to that dumbas$ attack! ;)