The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 14, 2006, 01:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,910
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
Whoa there, Bunky......

What do you mean "everyone else"?

I didn't agree with Chuck's view. Still don't. Not that it really matter though. If the official FED view is different than my personal view, the FED wins....every time.
Easy there grumpy.

I didn't mean that you agreed with the ruling, I meant that you agreed that the Fed had ruled on this issue as to NOT be a correctable error. Now if I could only remember what the original issue was.

Z
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 14, 2006, 02:14pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by zebraman
Easy there grumpy.

I didn't mean that you agreed with the ruling, I meant that you agreed that the Fed had ruled on this issue as to NOT be a correctable error. Now if I could only remember what the original issue was.

Z
Grumpy? Moi?

I agreed that Bob J. supplied a FED ruling that stated that my opinion was wrong. That FED ruling is now definitive as far as I'm concerned. Iow, as stated before, I was wrong. Now we have a conflicting Illinois ruling. Well, that rule is now a definitive ruling in Illinois imo. That doesn't mean that it's also a definitive ruling in the other 49 states. And that is unfortunate, and that is why we need something new out of the FED that will apply everywhere. It's not a matter really of any official here being right or wrong; it's a matter of getting a ruling that we all can use uniformly.

Make sense, Z?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 14, 2006, 02:27pm
Do not give a damn!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: On the border
Posts: 30,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
That doesn't mean that it's also a definitive ruling in the other 49 states. And that is unfortunate, and that is why we need something new out of the FED that will apply everywhere. It's not a matter really of any official here being right or wrong; it's a matter of getting a ruling that we all can use uniformly.
Unless all interpreters read rulings posted here or hold on to several year old rulings, then all 50 states are not going to be on the same page. We cannot get different officials in different areas in my state to always agree. If the NF feels strongly about this ruling, they should update their books to support it. I have yet to receive this year's rulebook. Who knows maybe this will be covered in a clearer manner.

Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble."
-----------------------------------------------------------
Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Sep 14, 2006, 02:35pm
In Memoriam
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hell
Posts: 20,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
I have yet to receive this year's rulebook. Who knows maybe this will be covered in a clearer manner.
I've got my new books. Nothing has changed with regards to this one.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Number of Free Throws on Intentional Foul? ReadyToRef Basketball 12 Mon Sep 06, 2004 09:53am
"free" throws John Chladek Basketball 8 Wed Mar 05, 2003 12:55pm
Shot Technical foul free throws at wrong basket. Jerry Blum Basketball 3 Wed Jan 29, 2003 11:48am
Free Throws?? Cyber-Ref Basketball 13 Thu Jan 23, 2003 08:17am
free throws 49john Basketball 6 Sat Jan 18, 2003 09:02pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:21am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1