Case book submissions?

[Dan_ref]

Originally Posted by ChuckElias

Now Dan can insert a comment about me not being here anymore.

You know how when you step in dog crap and the stink lingers even after you clean it off?

Yeah you're still here all right.

[Jurassic Referee]

Iirc, I was right on 5 out of the 7 that she answered. We differed on the "barking dog" which I thought was silly but OK, and the fumble by an airborne shooter which I though was traveling(still do ).

Of course, after seeing some of her other rulings....as in the backcourt one from last year.....

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee

Iirc, I was right on 5 out of the 7 that she answered. We differed on the "barking dog" which I thought was silly but OK, and the fumble by an airborne shooter which I though was traveling(still do ).

Of course, after seeing some of her other rulings....as in the backcourt one from last year.....

My percentage was MUCH higher!

But I'm still with you on that backcourt ruling.

[lukealex]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

My percentage was MUCH higher!

But I'm still with you on that backcourt ruling.

Ok I'll bite, do you happen to know the link to this particular backcourt play in question?

[Nevadaref]

Originally Posted by lukealex

Ok I'll bite, do you happen to know the link to this particular backcourt play in question?

2007-08 Basketball Rules Interpretations

SITUATION 10: A1, in the team's frontcourt, passes to A2, also in the team's frontcourt. B1 deflects the ball toward Team A's backcourt. The ball bounces only in Team A's frontcourt before crossing the division line. While the ball is still in the air over Team A's backcourt, but never having touched in Team A's backcourt, A2 gains possession of the ball while standing in Team A's backcourt. RULING: Backcourt violation on Team A. Team A was still in team control and caused the ball to have backcourt status. Had A2 permitted the ball to bounce in the backcourt after having been deflected by B1, there would have been no backcourt violation. (4-4-1; 4-4-3; 9-9-1)

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

2007-08 Basketball Rules Interpretations

SITUATION 10: A1, in the team's frontcourt, passes to A2, also in the team's frontcourt. B1 deflects the ball toward Team A's backcourt. The ball bounces only in Team A's frontcourt before crossing the division line. While the ball is still in the air over Team A's backcourt, but never having touched in Team A's backcourt, A2 gains possession of the ball while standing in Team A's backcourt. RULING: Backcourt violation on Team A. Team A was still in team control and caused the ball to have backcourt status. Had A2 permitted the ball to bounce in the backcourt after having been deflected by B1, there would have been no backcourt violation. (4-4-1; 4-4-3; 9-9-1)

Yup, it cites R9-9-1 to back it up, and 9-9-1 contradicts this ruling.

Silly monkey.

[Jurassic Referee]

Originally Posted by Dan_ref

You know how when you step in dog crap and the stink lingers even after you clean it off?

Yeah you're still here all right.

Put on your lederhosen, go out to the local beerhaus, have several steins of real beer and do a l'il oom pa pa-ing. Maybe meet a few new friends and see if you've got time to invade France while you're there also. It might put you in a better mood.

Btw, we alerted Customs about your return. It's a good thing that you enjoy full-cavity searches, isn't it?