|
Thu Apr 13, 2006, 06:13pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
One of the SEC official's observers I know is always saying that we don't need game interrupters. An example of this would be a kid going over the back of another kid and having sufficient enough contact to call a foul, but the player in front still gets the rebound and the contact doesn't cause him to fall or walk. That is just interrupting the game when you could keep the flow going.
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Incidental Contact?? | Just Curious | Softball | 3 | Tue Apr 26, 2005 02:30am |
| foul or incidental contact | CecilOne | Soccer | 6 | Tue Aug 05, 2003 01:45pm |
| Foul or incidental contact? | Buckley11 | Basketball | 1 | Sat Mar 01, 2003 06:39pm |
| Incidental contact | stewcall | Basketball | 19 | Fri Feb 07, 2003 12:20pm |
| Incidental contact? | Paul LeBoutillier | Basketball | 9 | Tue Jan 21, 2003 09:27am |
Threaded Mode
