|
Wed Apr 12, 2006, 04:43pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Incidental Contact
NCAA Sect. 36 Art. 3 - Contact that does not hinder normal defensive and offensive movement shall be viewed as incidental.
I noticed the specifics of this rule a month or two ago and have not been able to reconcile that with a lot of fouls I have seen called. This goes against a lot of "old fashion" 3-pt. plays, rebounding fouls, some of my previous posts (specifically about a defender fishing around for the ball while "reaching-in" from behind), and other fouls I thought were good calls. I could go on with the list, but you know what I mean. The wording leaves alot of room for contact to be incidental. Thoughts - IMOs?
__________________
- SamIAm (Senior Registered User) - (Concerning all judgement calls - they depend on age, ability, and severity) 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Incidental Contact?? | Just Curious | Softball | 3 | Tue Apr 26, 2005 02:30am |
| foul or incidental contact | CecilOne | Soccer | 6 | Tue Aug 05, 2003 01:45pm |
| Foul or incidental contact? | Buckley11 | Basketball | 1 | Sat Mar 01, 2003 06:39pm |
| Incidental contact | stewcall | Basketball | 19 | Fri Feb 07, 2003 12:20pm |
| Incidental contact? | Paul LeBoutillier | Basketball | 9 | Tue Jan 21, 2003 09:27am |
Threaded Mode
