|
Wed Mar 15, 2006, 05:15am
|
|||
|
|||
|
It sounds to me like the whole court case comes down to this point: Montgomery claims that he was provoked/enraged by a repeated racial taunt from the other official, and although he was part of the squabble out in public due to this mitigating circumstance he should not have been removed from his assignment the following night. He believes that is unfairly punishing him for reacting in an understandable manner.
The above is my conception of this whole mess. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Threaded Mode
