Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by Nevadaref
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
To me, it's clear the 9-9-3 does not cover the rebounder. If the NF wants to add it, great. But until then, I've got a violation.
|
I think that you either have to follow the rule to the letter and call all three of these backcourt violations or take the parentheses as just examples and allow all three plays as legal.
Mixing and matching doesn't cut it.
|
Um, we are following the rule to the letter, as per the way we read it. What we aren't following is your very own personal interpretation of that rule, Nevada.
Big, big difference.
|
You aren't following the rule to the letter if you are going to allow this action when it is not DURING a jumpball.
Once the jumpball ends, with A2 touching the ball, how do you still consider A3 to be covered by 9-3-3?
Fri Mar 03, 2006, 04:33am
Threaded Mode
