The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 21, 2005, 10:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
That was my first reaction as well Mark, but the rule says try for a goal, not try for a field goal.
However, looking through the rulebook, the phrase "try for goal" is used completely synonymously with "try for field goal."
Yep, I noticed that too.

This play is fully covered by 2-3.


Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 01:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
Re: Re: Well, for one thing

Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
Here's what happened tonight. After A1 shoots the ball, A2 pushes B1 and is called for the foul. Team B is in the bonus, but we give the ball to B out of bounds. B inbounds and brings the ball upcourt. After a few seconds, I realize that we should have shot 1-1. I blow my whistle and recognize the correctable error. We put B1 on the line to shoot 1-1. The timer asks, "Do we reset the shot clock?" I think for a moment and decide yes, but I'm thinking to myself that I'd better look it up in the rulebook when I get home. So I did a quick look, but I don't see any rule that tells me that I should reset.

Thoughts? Rule reference?
The shot clock is reset when a foul occurs.

A foul has occurred. You have just gotten around to properly recognizing it.
No, we recognized the foul (reported it, etc) and reset the shot clock when we gave the ball to B to inbounds. When I stopped play to deal with the correctable error, the foul had occurred 17 seconds previously.
Like I said, you have just gotten around to properly recognizing it. Reset the shot clock.
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 01:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
The Fed rules reference the shot clock?

Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
I say reset the clock (2-10-4 in the 2004 rulebook). No change of posession, so you start as after "any normal freethrow." I, for one, have never seen a shot clock at less than 35(30) during a FT.
The Fed rules reference the shot clock?
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 01:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
That's another, even more reasonable reason

Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
I say reset the clock (2-10-4 in the 2004 rulebook). No change of posession, so you start as after "any normal freethrow." I, for one, have never seen a shot clock at less than 35(30) during a FT.
That was my reasoning, too. But if you look at when the shot-clock operator is supposed to reset (2-14 in the 2006 NCAA rulebook), it's hard to find which situation applies.
It's is? 2-1-4-6b seems to apply: "When a foul occurs (exceptions:" (double or simultaneous foul; T on offense)

Look at it this way -- Team control will be lost on the FTs, so whoever gets the rebound, or inbounds the ball, will have a full shot-clock.

That's another, even more reasonable reason.
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 09:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Mid-Hudson valley, New York
Posts: 751
Send a message via AIM to Lotto
Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
This play is fully covered by 2-3.
I think that's my conclusion as well!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 09:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Mid-Hudson valley, New York
Posts: 751
Send a message via AIM to Lotto
Re: That's another, even more reasonable reason

Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Look at it this way -- Team control will be lost on the FTs, so whoever gets the rebound, or inbounds the ball, will have a full shot-clock.
That's another, even more reasonable reason.
That's a dangerous way to start thinking. Team control is lost on an out-of-bounds violation, on a double foul, on a held ball, but the shot-clock is not always reset in these situations. The team that next gains will not always have a full shot-clock to work with.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 10:02am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,801
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
I say reset the clock (2-10-4 in the 2004 rulebook). No change of posession, so you start as after "any normal freethrow." I, for one, have never seen a shot clock at less than 35(30) during a FT.
That was my reasoning, too. But if you look at when the shot-clock operator is supposed to reset (2-14 in the 2006 NCAA rulebook), it's hard to find which situation applies.
It's is? 2-1-4-6b seems to apply: "When a foul occurs (exceptions:" (double or simultaneous foul; T on offense)

Look at it this way -- Team control will be lost on the FTs, so whoever gets the rebound, or inbounds the ball, will have a full shot-clock.

Problem is that the shot clock isn't reset on the loss of team control, it is reset when the opponent gains team control.

Again, I think the shot clock should be reset, but I can't come up with a good rule reference as to why.
__________________
"To win the game is great. To play the game is greater. But to love the game is the greatest of all."
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 11:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
I say reset the clock (2-10-4 in the 2004 rulebook). No change of posession, so you start as after "any normal freethrow." I, for one, have never seen a shot clock at less than 35(30) during a FT.
That was my reasoning, too. But if you look at when the shot-clock operator is supposed to reset (2-14 in the 2006 NCAA rulebook), it's hard to find which situation applies.
It's is? 2-1-4-6b seems to apply: "When a foul occurs (exceptions:" (double or simultaneous foul; T on offense)

Look at it this way -- Team control will be lost on the FTs, so whoever gets the rebound, or inbounds the ball, will have a full shot-clock.

Problem is that the shot clock isn't reset on the loss of team control, it is reset when the opponent gains team control.

Again, I think the shot clock should be reset, but I can't come up with a good rule reference as to why.
But I already posted a good reason why it should not be reset: in some cases you give a team a shot clock period greater than 35 seconds for free and due to your own error. No way this is an intended consequence.

Reset it if the non-shooting team gets the rebound. Do not reset it when either team consumed time off the shot clock & gets the ball back after the FTs.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 11:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
Re: Re: That's another, even more reasonable reason

Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Look at it this way -- Team control will be lost on the FTs, so whoever gets the rebound, or inbounds the ball, will have a full shot-clock.
That's another, even more reasonable reason.
That's a dangerous way to start thinking. Team control is lost on an out-of-bounds violation, on a double foul, on a held ball, but the shot-clock is not always reset in these situations. The team that next gains will not always have a full shot-clock to work with.
Not under the circumstances at issue.
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 11:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
a distinction without a difference?

Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
I say reset the clock (2-10-4 in the 2004 rulebook). No change of posession, so you start as after "any normal freethrow." I, for one, have never seen a shot clock at less than 35(30) during a FT.
That was my reasoning, too. But if you look at when the shot-clock operator is supposed to reset (2-14 in the 2006 NCAA rulebook), it's hard to find which situation applies.
It's is? 2-1-4-6b seems to apply: "When a foul occurs (exceptions:" (double or simultaneous foul; T on offense)

Look at it this way -- Team control will be lost on the FTs, so whoever gets the rebound, or inbounds the ball, will have a full shot-clock.

Problem is that the shot clock isn't reset on the loss of team control, it is reset when the opponent gains team control.

Again, I think the shot clock should be reset, but I can't come up with a good rule reference as to why.
"Problem is that the shot clock isn't reset on the loss of team control, it is reset when the opponent gains team control."

When a team loses control, the shot clock is going to be reset, is it not? When it runs again is another issue.

__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 11:55am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
Where is the shot clock referenced in Fed rules?

Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Lotto
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
I say reset the clock (2-10-4 in the 2004 rulebook). No change of posession, so you start as after "any normal freethrow." I, for one, have never seen a shot clock at less than 35(30) during a FT.
That was my reasoning, too. But if you look at when the shot-clock operator is supposed to reset (2-14 in the 2006 NCAA rulebook), it's hard to find which situation applies.
It's is? 2-1-4-6b seems to apply: "When a foul occurs (exceptions:" (double or simultaneous foul; T on offense)

Look at it this way -- Team control will be lost on the FTs, so whoever gets the rebound, or inbounds the ball, will have a full shot-clock.

Problem is that the shot clock isn't reset on the loss of team control, it is reset when the opponent gains team control.

Again, I think the shot clock should be reset, but I can't come up with a good rule reference as to why.
Where is the shot clock referenced in Fed rules?
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 12:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Re: a distinction without a difference?

Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker
When a team loses control, the shot clock is going to be reset, is it not? When it runs again is another issue.
Nope, Jeff. As Mark pointed out, team control is lost when a try is released. But if the try is an airball, there is no reset if control is re-gained by the offensive team.

The short version that I give my HS shot clock operators is as follows:

"There are only 4 times we reset the shot clock. 1) Any change of possession, that includes a made basket. 2) Any time the ball hits the rim on a try. 3) Any foul. 4) A defensive violation, like a kick. That's it. That's the list."

Now, that's simplified, and it's not quite right b/c of the NCAA change in the kick rule's enforcement and NCAA T's that go to the POI. But even if I gave the absolutely correct list, you wouldn't find "loss of team control" on the list anywhere.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 12:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Western Mass.
Posts: 9,105
Send a message via AIM to ChuckElias
Re: Where is the shot clock referenced in Fed rules?

Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker
Where is the shot clock referenced in Fed rules?
It's not. Not even as a state adoption.
__________________
Any NCAA rules and interpretations in this post are relevant for men's games only!
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 12:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Just north of hell
Posts: 9,250
Send a message via AIM to Dan_ref
Re: a distinction without a difference?

Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker

"Problem is that the shot clock isn't reset on the loss of team control, it is reset when the opponent gains team control."

When a team loses control, the shot clock is going to be reset, is it not?
Not always.

Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker

Where is the shot clock referenced in Fed rules?


It's not.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 22, 2005, 04:14pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
Re: Re: a distinction without a difference?

Quote:
Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker

"Problem is that the shot clock isn't reset on the loss of team control, it is reset when the opponent gains team control."

When a team loses control, the shot clock is going to be reset, is it not?
Not always.

Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker

Where is the shot clock referenced in Fed rules?


It's not.
"When a team loses control, the shot clock is going to be reset, is it not?

Not always."

Yah, during a throw-in, for example, when the ball is out off the defense . . .

Still, the whole thing is a tempest in a tea pot.
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:17am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1