Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
It's not? The potential for sex offenders to repeat their crimes against minors is not what were talking about? Why the heck else would we screen for this then? Morbid curiosity? Of course we're talking about the fact that sex offenders repeat their crimes. That is exactly the point of the discussion. Why else would the newspaper run a story about a sex offender officiating high school games? To praise him for rehabilitating himself?
I think I understand the point that you were trying to make as well. But to say that we were not discussing the potential for a sex offender to repeat his crimes simply ignores the whole basis of the thread.
|
The problem is you are focused on one topic, I was commenting on another topic. If that is what you were talking about, do not project that on what I was saying. I never addressed the original topic but to only say that what kinds of background checks are done in my state. I made a throw away statement about hypocrisy and just as predicted a few of you bit on the comments. If that bothers you that I made my statement, I guess you will just have to be upset. I still was not referring to the story of the official caught that was a sex offender. You cannot make me refer to something because that is what you are concerned with.
Peace
Tue Dec 06, 2005, 03:27pm
Threaded Mode
