Quote:
Originally posted by ChuckElias
Quote:
Originally posted by JRutledge
The problem is you are focused on one topic, I was commenting on another topic.
|
That's not a "problem", b/c as I stated in my post, I think I actually understand the point that you were making. Believe it or not, I'm intelligent enough to follow two lines of thought at once.
Quote:
|
If that is what you were talking about, do not project that on what I was saying.
|
But you were the one who was "projecting" by saying that we weren't talking about the offender's likelihood of repeating his crime; when in fact, that's exactly what we were talking about. Your point was a different topic. I got that. But you weren't correct in the comment that I quoted.
|
Chuck, Chuck, Chuck. If anyone was responding to me, they could not be talking about the story that prompted this thread. I never addressed the issue with the official getting busted for being a sex offender. Show me the line where I said anything about that. I answered a question about background checks. That is what I was talking about. If you want to get into what was in the story that is your right to do so. That is not what I commented on or why I responded. So yes, I was correct because all my comments were about background checks, not the issues dealing with why this guy got caught. Not sure why that is so difficult to understand.
Peace