|
Every year there always seems to be those couple of questions that are just worded horribly. I've just learned to 'let it go' if it turns out I got it wrong because I read it one way and they meant something else.
In this example, it is very reasonable for someone to read this question and think that they are asking about two types of fouls, 1 - Double personal, and 2 - technical. If a technical, in itself, was not a type of foul, then it would make sense to add the word double in front of it to help make sense of the question.
I got this one wrong and just chalked it up. I guarantee you'll see another like this on next year's test.
__________________
When the horn sounds, we're outta here.
|
Tue Nov 15, 2005, 06:43pm
Threaded Mode
