Tue Nov 15, 2005, 07:00am
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,011
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by roadking
true, but thats what confusing about the question it does not say double technical. i believe it to be false by nfhs letter of the rule.
|
The answer is TRUE.
If they had meant it the way you're interpreting it, it would have read,
"Point of interuption is a method of resuming play after a double personal FOUL or A technical foul."
The fact that the statement doesn't include FOUL or A makes the statement TRUE.
"Point of interuption is a method of resuming play after a double personal or technical foul," meaning that the words double and foul extend to the conjunctive phrase "personal or technical."
|
Well put, Tony.
Now just sit back and wait for Juulie to come along and give you your ATTABOY.
|