![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Hmmmm.... Where have we see this before? .... Oh, yeah, way back on the first page of this thread: Quote:
|
|
|||
Just having some fun with you.
![]() It happens all the time in long threads. People read part of it and then skip around. This leads to asking a question or making a point about something that was already made earlier. We all do it. No worries. |
|
|||
ball location & player location
Quote:
Ball location isn't an issue in the case you describe, and, because the matters of 'location' are handled inconsistenly, there is at least one undecidable proposition out there . . .
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient. |
|
|||
Re: ball location & player location
Quote:
In this case, A1 was the last to have touched the ball before it went to the backcourt and A1 was the first to touch the ball after the ball went into the backcourt. THe ball, for both parts of the situation, went into the backcourt the moment that A1 landed in the backcourt. The fact that A1 had frontcout location only confuses the rule.
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
|
|||
Just a note....this is my first post--A GREEN HORN--I just wanted to thank Nevadaref for giving the best explanations of that whole thread.....A1 touched the ball WHEN it went backcourt...not BEFORE. A very good job, and IMHO, the definitive word on that subject...the middle of that thread got way too deep for me to follow...sorry....Skarecrow
__________________
I love to mate.....Chess, The Kings Game |
|
|||
You mean it he touched it when it went into
Quote:
But this is all solipsism. Study logic.
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|