Quote:
Originally posted by bob jenkins
Quote:
Originally posted by Junker
Shouldn't it have only been one T as per 10.1.2c Penalty. One foul only per tem regardless of the number of infractions?
|
Why is this a violation of 10-1-2c and not a violation of 10-3-1? 
|
In this sitch, the SCORER was informed and required to change the scorebook; hence 10-1-2c. In a situation invoking 10-3-1, a player with a changed number would have already become a player when the technical foul was discovered. Harsh penalty for 10-3-1, I guess designed for a player who played under a previous number, changed numbers and reentered the game?
Fri Nov 11, 2005, 08:28am
Threaded Mode
