The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   5 second count in NBA? (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/2299-5-second-count-nba.html)

Mark Padgett Fri May 04, 2001 10:14pm

I was flipping channels between hockey and basketball and just caught the end of what appeared to be a 5 second count in the Raptors - Knicks game against the Knicks when they were on offense. Can anyone explain what happened? Thanks.

I know there used to be an "illegal offensive set" violation in the NBA where 4 players were on the weak side above the free throw line. Was this it?

Richard Ogg Fri May 04, 2001 11:29pm

Nailed!
 
Sure, Mark, I was watching.

I can't tell you who the players were, but NY brought the ball down and the guard (?) was "defended" by the Raptor -- quite close. The official was right behind the NY guard and started a 5-second count -- <u>very visible</u>! After 5 counts (I counted with him, <font size=-2>admittedly out loud</font>) he blew the whistle, held up the 5 digits, and they went the other way.

I must say I have rarely seen this called in the NBA, but generally they break off in time. Dumb offensive play to get caught on that.

I don't watch enough NBA to recognize the illegal defense; we're encouraged <b>NOT</b> to watch NBA during the season so as not to contaminate our judgment. :)

Dewey1 Fri May 04, 2001 11:44pm

The 5 second call was against Glenn Rice and it really had nothing to do with being closely guarded. In the NBA once you turn your back to the basket, with the ball and are below the foul-line you only have 5 seconds to make your offensive more. This rule is commonly called the Charles Barkley rule because he would get the ball on the block and stick out he big backside and just dribble the ball for 10 to 15 seconds before shooting. The idea is to speed up the game and get rid of the "bum" ball as it is called. I was surprized to see it called though in the playoffs. It is rarely ever called period.

Though even stranger was the "illegal offense" call made against the Raptors earlier in the game. They isolated Vince on a wing and then had all 4 of their other players on the other side of the hoop above the 3-point line. I had never seen that called before. The announcer even said that the reason Lenny Wilkens was arguing was because he did not understand what the call was. LOL.

Richard Ogg Fri May 04, 2001 11:52pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Dewey1
... once you turn your back to the basket....
Hmm. My recollection was that Glenn was <u>facing</u> the defender and the basket. In fact, this is supported by him not seeing the official counting, because the official was standing right behind him. Now I wish I had taped the game.

Kelvin green Sat May 05, 2001 01:17am

The illegal offense call as you refer to it is an illegal isolation call. It is not called often. I know it was called a few times on the Jazz when Mark Eaton played. I am sure there are others, and the 5 second backdown call has been around a couple of years!

BktBallRef Sat May 05, 2001 01:28am

Actually, if his back or side is to the basket, the count starts. Basically, he has to be facing the basket. It's also the first time that I've ever seen it called. It appeared to me that the officials were specifically looking for a possible violation by Rice. Ed F. Rush started the count immediately.

However, I have seen isolation called on the offense before. If Carter was isolated on one side of the floor and at least 3 teammates are positioned above the tip of the circle on the weakside, it's a violation.

Dan_ref Mon May 07, 2001 09:09am

Quote:

Originally posted by Mark Padgett
I was flipping channels between hockey and basketball ...
Hey Mark, I'm impressed you could tell the difference
playoff NBA & playoff NHL! :)

BktBallRef Mon May 07, 2001 10:53am

Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:

Originally posted by Mark Padgett
I was flipping channels between hockey and basketball ...
Hey Mark, I'm impressed you could tell the difference
playoff NBA & playoff NHL! :)

OUCH! Whaddya think? Should Juwan Howard have been ejected?

Dan_ref Mon May 07, 2001 11:38am

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_ref
Quote:

Originally posted by Mark Padgett
I was flipping channels between hockey and basketball ...
Hey Mark, I'm impressed you could tell the difference
playoff NBA & playoff NHL! :)

OUCH! Whaddya think? Should Juwan Howard have been ejected?

Nah, just a 2 minute minor (or maybe just send him back to
Michigan :p

Mark Padgett Mon May 07, 2001 02:45pm

Quote:

Hey Mark, I'm impressed you could tell the difference
playoff NBA & playoff NHL! :)

OUCH! Whaddya think? Should Juwan Howard have been ejected?
Of course, I don't have the same visual perspective watching on television as the official on the floor has, but since you asked - it looked like a flagrant level 1 to me. He really did make a quasi-attempt at the ball.

BTW - here's the latest on what's going to happen with the Trailblazers here in Portland. They're keeping Rasheed Wallace, firing Mike Dunleavy and replacing him with former coach P.J. Carlismo, trading to get Latrelle Sprewell from the Knicks and then having the team join the NHL.

Or maybe the WWF.

BktBallRef Mon May 07, 2001 09:20pm

Might I suggest the XFL! :)

Mark Padgett Tue May 08, 2001 12:07am

I forgot one thing - Bobby Knight as assistant coach.

DrakeM Tue May 08, 2001 07:34am

5 second count
 
Actually, the isolation violation is for 3 players or
more above the tip of the circle on the weakside.
And I'm surprised Mark, that you made the statement,
that because Howard made a "Quasi-attempt" to play the ball,
it should have been only a Flagrant 1. Sounds like a coach.;-)
A Flagrant 2 usually calls itself. And when Derek Anderson
went "*** over tea-kettle", that "called itself." IMHO of course.

BktBallRef Tue May 08, 2001 08:53am

Re: 5 second count
 
Quote:

Originally posted by DrakeM
Actually, the isolation violation is for 3 players or
more above the tip of the circle on the weakside.

Actually, this is exactly what I said in my first post.

DrakeM Tue May 08, 2001 09:06am

Actually, you're right!
Sorry I missed it.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:41am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1