Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:
Originally posted by devdog69
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
The correct ruling should have been a personal foul, not a technical foul He could certainly rule the foul either flagrant or intentional if he chose to. But the foul should have been personal, as it was a live ball, contact foul. 2 FTs by the shooter and the ball for the shooter's team would be the correct penalty. No other player would be allowed to shoot.
|
...unless the fouled player was injured in which case her substitute would shoot the free throws and we would inbound the ball on the baseline, in this case.
|
I'm based my response on what was written, not would else might possibly happen. He said nothing about the shooter being injured.
|
I base...
I'm basing...
I've based...
Any of these would be correct...
No, nothing was said about the shooter being injured, but when you stated that 'no other player would be allowed to shoot' I felt that could be misleading. Any time you have a flagrant foul you are prone to having an injured player. I just want to make sure you don't mislead anybody.
Tue Aug 09, 2005, 11:31pm
Hybrid Mode
