View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 10, 2005, 01:08am
assignmentmaker assignmentmaker is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 508
Re: Correct

Quote:
Originally posted by assignmentmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by BktBallRef
The correct ruling should have been a personal foul, not a technical foul He could certainly rule the foul either flagrant or intentional if he chose to. But the foul should have been personal, as it was a live ball, contact foul. 2 FTs by the shooter and the ball for the shooter's team would be the correct penalty. No other player would be allowed to shoot.
And, if the ball HAD gone in, count the basket.
Assuming this was rightly called an intentional personal foul . . . too hard.

(If the additional property 'flagrant' were added, player tossed.)
__________________
Sarchasm: the gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the recipient.
Reply With Quote