Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
Originally posted by mick
Quote:
Originally posted by Jurassic Referee
Quote:
|
Originally posted by assignmentmaker
|
Assuming this was rightly called an intentional personal foul . . . too hard.
(If the additional property 'flagrant' were added, player tossed.)
|
You can't add any additional properties to an intentional personal foul. You can call this an intentional personal foul. You could also call it a flagrant personal foul if it was judged to meet that rules definition. There is no no such foul called an flagrant intentional personal foul though.
|
Well, ... is an unintentional flagrant foul incidental contact? [/B]
|
Flagrant incidental contact?
You can go to jail for that.
[/B][/QUOTE]
Yes and no. Conceptually, flagrancy is a property added. The rules takes the approach of saying, in effect, a foul is some particular set of preperties - without organizing them in a hierachry. It's a LOT easier to grasp them in a hierarchy. I have done one for some of the officials I assign and it worked the bomb.