![]() |
|
|
|||
![]()
Had this the other night. Right before the end of the first quarter, the home team had the ball and they were up a few points. It's was obvious they were holding for the last shot of the quarter. This gym has only one scoreboard on the wall and it was "behind" them. When the clock got down to five seconds, the home book keeper at the table started yelling the seconds left really loud, apparently to help his team.
At the half, I told him he couldn't do that as he was part of the officiating crew and had to remain neutral. He apologized and that was that. We had almost the same game situation near the end of the second quarter and I looked over at the guy. He looked back at me and smiled, then gave the "zip your lip" gesture while nodding his head. The clock went off and we both chuckled. Would any of your guys done anything different? I didn't want to "punish" the team by blowing the whistle and stopping the clock when he did it, I thought just letting it go and then admonishing him was the best way to handle it.
__________________
Yom HaShoah |
|
|||
Just a thought, but since there was only one scoreboard on one end of the gym, why wouldn't the clock operator do this anyway, and for both teams at the end of each period?
I do agree it's technically not the book keeper's responsibility, but perhaps they had set up that arrangement at the table because the book person has the louder voice? Just thinking out loud. (Well, as loud as my keyboard gets.)
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
Quote:
If coaches or players want to count down, I have no problem with that. Since it does constitute assistance, that's properly the job of a coach or teammate.
__________________
Cheers, mb |
|
|||
This is what happens during college games, especially with the shot-clock. I would allow that as it isn't in the rulebook that they could not do that. But I wouldn't allow the scorer to do that as it is not listed as one of their duties.
|
|
|||
Totally agree
|
|
|||
Quote:
I agree. At the same time, ironically, in HS SOCCER games, the timer/announcer is to count down the final 10 seconds. |
|
|||
Quote:
I had a similar situation come up in an NCAA game involving a shot clock, where one shot clock, on one end of the floor, did not work. We were told by the NCAA rules secretary at the time that it was indeed the table's responsibility to verbally count down the time when the shot clock neared expiration during the possessions on the side where the clock did not work. This was to be done for both teams, in both halves. It was determined that the table needed to provide the information equally to both teams, and it was an unfair advantage for one team to see a clock while the other could not. I'm just extending that logic to this situation. If there's only one clock/scoreboard, and it's on the side of the court where both teams have to look to the side to see it, then both teams are equally advantaged/disadvantaged, and no additional table help is needed. If there's only one clock on one end, then I would have the table verbally count down (say, under 10 seconds) for each period, for both teams, when the offense is on the opposite end of the floor.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
I don't think it's a good idea for them to do that even if the agreement was that they would do it for both teams. If Team B never had the ball at that end of the gym as time was running out - it would still appear as if Team A was getting favoritism even if that was not the case - just different circumstances.
__________________
![]() |
|
|||
As long as we atre talking about the table workers being part of the officiating crew and have to remain neutral, can the person keeping the book for the visiting team assist his coach by answering questions regarding NFHS rules or give his teams coach advice?? If the table is part of the officiating crew most of the games I have seen they do not seem like they are aware of that.
|
|
|||
Quote:
NEAR THE END OF PLAYING TIME: 1. If a watch is being used as the official timepiece, place it so that the timer may see it & the ball. The watch must be stopped the instant the signal ending the game is sounded. 2. When a timing device other than a watch is the official timepiece, the timer must assist in determining the position of the ball when time expires. 3. Some timers, in order to avoid misunderstanding concerning the position of the ball when time expires, have one person watch the official timepiece & count aloud 10 - 9 - 8 - 7, etc., while another person watches the ball & notes its position at the exact moment time expires. 4. If a quarter or extra period ends &: a. The timer has been unable to make an official hear the signal, the timer must immediately notify the official. b. The timing signal fails or is not heard by an official, the timer must be prepared to advise the referee as to whether the ball was in flight when time expired, or whether a foul occurred before or after the period had ended. c. The timing signal is not heard by the officials, testimony of the timer may determine whether a score shall count or a foul shall be charged, unless the referee has information which would alter the situation. |
|
|||
As long as the timer does it at the end of every period, I have no problem with it and in fact think they should do it (in the case where a clock is not reasonably visible to the players).
__________________
Owner/Developer of RefTown.com Commissioner, Portland Basketball Officials Association |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are officials allowed to "guess" the amount of time to put on the clock? | All_Heart | Basketball | 1 | Mon Nov 30, 2009 09:30am |
why aren't nfl employees allowed to say "nfl"? | PackersFTW | Football | 20 | Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:17am |
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight | pizanno | Basketball | 27 | Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am |