The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Basketball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 10:27am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 298
Send a message via AIM to lukealex
Is it over and back if A1 (who is in the FC) passes to A2 who has jumped from the BC, catches the ball in mid-air and lands in the FC?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 10:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pflugerville, TX
Posts: 293
Send a message via Yahoo to SeanFitzRef
YES.
__________________
Nature gave men two ends - one to sit on and one to think with. Ever since then man's success or failure has been dependent on the one he used most.
-- George R. Kirkpatrick
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 10:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Yep.

A2 has the same status as where they last touched - BC.

__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 10:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Pflugerville, TX
Posts: 293
Send a message via Yahoo to SeanFitzRef
A2 must establish court position in the front court. Team possession has already been established in the front court by A1. A2 has to take at least one step in the front court to be established.
__________________
Nature gave men two ends - one to sit on and one to think with. Ever since then man's success or failure has been dependent on the one he used most.
-- George R. Kirkpatrick
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 10:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 298
Send a message via AIM to lukealex
Would the same rule apply if the player was out of bounds, caught the ball in mid-air, then landed in bounds?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 10:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Yep, same theory.

__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 10:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 127
So- are you still angry at the official that got it right?

Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 11:05am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 298
Send a message via AIM to lukealex
Nope, that would be me that got it right, would like to be able to show the team (rec ball) and other ref who thought I was so wrong how right I actually was though
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 11:25am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,592
Just remember that you are where you are until you get where you're going.
__________________
Do you ever feel like your stuff strutted off without you?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 12:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 9,466
Send a message via AIM to rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by M&M Guy
Yep, same theory.

Same theory, but it's not a back-court violation, it's an oob violation. Same result, but different signal.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 12:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 298
Send a message via AIM to lukealex
Quote:
Originally posted by ChrisSportsFan
Just remember that you are where you are until you get where you're going.
I didn't think that always worked since on in-bounds situations there isn't any team control - a player can jump from FC, catch ball mid-air, land in BC, not a violation. But if a player was OOB for some odd reason and there wasn't team control (in-bounds, shot attempt, etc.) it would still be a violation since the player came from OOB and touched the ball before touching the court in bounds, assuming a violation wasn't called when the player was OOB.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 12:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally posted by ChrisSportsFan
Just remember that you are where you are until you get where you're going.

If you follow this simple little phrase you will always remember and be able ot explain it when the players and coaches go nutz!
__________________
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
Chris Z.
Detroit/SE Michigan
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 12:38pm
Esteemed Participant
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 4,775
Quote:
Originally posted by lukealex
Quote:
Originally posted by ChrisSportsFan
Just remember that you are where you are until you get where you're going.
I didn't think that always worked since on in-bounds situations there isn't any team control - a player can jump from FC, catch ball mid-air, land in BC, not a violation. But if a player was OOB for some odd reason and there wasn't team control (in-bounds, shot attempt, etc.) it would still be a violation since the player came from OOB and touched the ball before touching the court in bounds, assuming a violation wasn't called when the player was OOB.
You are correct...it's stated as an EXCEPTION in the rules book....
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 12:52pm
certified Hot Mom tester
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: only in my own mind, such as it is
Posts: 12,918
Quote:
Originally posted by Robmoz
Quote:
Originally posted by ChrisSportsFan
Just remember that you are where you are until you get where you're going.

If you follow this simple little phrase you will always remember and be able ot explain it when the players and coaches go nutz!
Actually - it's "You are where you were 'till you get where you're going."
__________________
Yom HaShoah
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 23, 2005, 01:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 5,687
Quote:
Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:
Originally posted by M&M Guy
Yep, same theory.

Same theory, but it's not a back-court violation, it's an oob violation. Same result, but different signal.
Agreed - I was just going with the quick answer trying to point out that it was a violation as well. I also wanted to avoid long answers and words rhyming with "truck".

Now, I am at work and I am going to lunch.
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department.

(Used with permission.)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1