|
|||
I worked a couple of AAU games this weekend that were supposedly using NCAA womens rules.
I watched the game before mine and noticed when one of the officials called a backcourt violation, the table buzzed him over and the violation was not enforced. I asked the official after the game was over about the call, and he explained he was told because there was a shot clock, there was no backcourt rule. I asked two different people at the table and was told it was a tounament rule. I have never officiated any game or tournament that had this rule. Have any of you ever had a game that used this rule? Are NCAA womens backcourt rules different then Federation rules once front court is established?
__________________
Failure is fertile ground on which to plant new seeds. |
|
|||
Quote:
There's still a bc violation that team A can't be both last to touch in the fc, and first to touch in bc after it has attained front court status. Or whatever the darn wording ought to be. |
|
|||
Quote:
I did know not to have a 10 second count in the backcourt and not to have a 5 second count unless the ball was held and the player was closely guarded (with-in 3 feet I think for NCAA women). I even got to give the finger whirl for a shot clock reset after a kicked ball. "Once front court is established" meant front court status had been attained.
__________________
Failure is fertile ground on which to plant new seeds. |
|
|||
I did some AAU women this weekend also, although by women I mean mostly freshman and sophomore high school, and why they have them using a 30 second clock and playing by NCAAW is beyond me, because the earliest many will see that is 3 years from now.
|
|
|||
Quote:
The backcourt rule must have been one of those "special" tournament rules because that is not the NCAAW rule... |
|
|||
Was the "backcourt violation" you saw a 10 second violation or an over-and-back violation? My only guess is the official called a 10 second violation and the table corrected him because there was a shot clock in effect.
I've never heard of an over-and-back violation being eliminated under the guise of NCAA rules in a tournament.
__________________
There are two kinds of fools: One says, “This is old, therefore it is good”; the other says, “This is new, therefore it is better.” - W.R. Inge |
|
|||
Quote:
[Edited by PGCougar on May 16th, 2005 at 05:46 PM]
__________________
There are two kinds of fools: One says, “This is old, therefore it is good”; the other says, “This is new, therefore it is better.” - W.R. Inge |
|
|||
Quote:
There is definitely "over and back" under all rules, including NCAA-W. If the table said no, then my guess is that someone had a misunderstanding of the rules. |
|
|||
BktBallRef -
I'm talking over and back. At this point I'm convinced the table personnel were confused about the difference between a ten second backcourt count and a backcourt violation. If this ever happens again I will ask to see a copy of the tournament rules and try to provide an explanation.
__________________
Failure is fertile ground on which to plant new seeds. |
|
|||
Ok, I'm sorry. Shot clock is not used in high school in Texas.
On another note however, can't a college coach tell if a player is good if they are playing under Fed rules??? A few good women ball players get recruited out of Texas (e.g. Baylor) where the high schools don't use a shot clock, or play NCAAW rules. |
|
|||
As long as we're on the subject (NCAA-W), I've got a different question. I had someone tell me this weekend (no names mentioned) that in women's college the 5-seconds holding rule doesn't include a condition that it be closely guarded. IS THAT TRUE!?!?! I thought it was a closely guarded rule, not just a holding rule. This person insisted that to hold the ball for 5 seconds is a violation, regardless of whether the ball handler is closely guarded.
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Aw, go ahead and give up "no name"! Is it anybody we know? It's only just us talkin'; no one else will know...
__________________
M&M's - The Official Candy of the Department of Redundancy Department. (Used with permission.) |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
Bookmarks |
|
|