The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Basketball (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/)
-   -   2005-06 rules changes (https://forum.officiating.com/basketball/19540-2005-06-rules-changes.html)

Snake~eyes Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:08pm

Quote:

Originally posted by brainbrian
Quote:

Originally posted by Snake~eyes
I hope they make the "playing oob" a violation instead of a technical foul.
I had a partner call it a violation, no one knew the difference. :D Then afterwards his teammate told him he couldn't do that. They player said "I know."

I would prefer the violation better.

LOL, You quoted it wrong! :D I didn't say that!

brandan89 Sat Apr 09, 2005 03:34pm

I hear their wanting to change the uniform.....


Striped shirt, instead of black pants, going with the fishnets. :)

[Edited by brandan89 on Apr 9th, 2005 at 07:31 PM]

Mark Padgett Sat Apr 09, 2005 06:24pm

Quote:

Originally posted by brandan89
I hear their wanting to change the uniform.....


Striped shirt, instad of black pants, going with the fishnets. :)

You mean without shorts!?!?!? :rolleyes:

brandan89 Sat Apr 09, 2005 06:31pm

Hmmm... Lets hope they require them. :)

refnrev Sun Apr 10, 2005 07:43pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Mark Padgett
Quote:

Originally posted by brandan89
I hear their wanting to change the uniform.....


Striped shirt, instad of black pants, going with the fishnets. :)

You mean without shorts!?!?!? :rolleyes:

__________________________________________________ _________

Padgett,
You scare me some days, man -- you really do! (LOL)
RR

Spence Tue Apr 12, 2005 01:05pm

Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:

Originally posted by FrankHtown
Ok...where does 9-2-12 fit in? "No teammate of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins"

I interpret that to mean if a teammate of the thrower goes out of bounds, it's a throw-in violation. Is that the correct interpretation?

Are we to call a violation or a technical?

That's correct. It's a violation for a seconf player to be OOB when his team's thrower is already OOB with the ball.

Is this true only on a designated throw-in and not true after a made basket? I'm picturing the OOB play where A1 is taking it out against pressure, A2 runs out of bounds where A1 then passes it to him and A1 then goes inbounds to receive the pass.

Is this only a violation if its on a designated throw-in?

Camron Rust Tue Apr 12, 2005 03:39pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Spence
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:

Originally posted by FrankHtown
Ok...where does 9-2-12 fit in? "No teammate of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins"

I interpret that to mean if a teammate of the thrower goes out of bounds, it's a throw-in violation. Is that the correct interpretation?

Are we to call a violation or a technical?

That's correct. It's a violation for a seconf player to be OOB when his team's thrower is already OOB with the ball.

Is this true only on a designated throw-in and not true after a made basket? I'm picturing the OOB play where A1 is taking it out against pressure, A2 runs out of bounds where A1 then passes it to him and A1 then goes inbounds to receive the pass.

Is this only a violation if its on a designated throw-in?

You are correct. The restriction is only applicable on a designated spot throwin.

FrankHtown Tue Apr 12, 2005 04:07pm

OK, then...my question is...if we see a teammate of the thrower run out of bounds, for example, to get behind a screen, ...why aren't we calling a violation, and make giving the technical a moot point?

walter Tue Apr 12, 2005 04:30pm

The only potential rule change that I've heard of (from a committee member)and apparently it is getting very serious consideration is expanding the high school coaching box to match the college coaching box (i.e. end line to 28 foot line). Other than that, nothing dramatic is being discussed.

Jurassic Referee Tue Apr 12, 2005 04:31pm

Quote:

Originally posted by FrankHtown
OK, then...my question is...if we see a teammate of the thrower run out of bounds, for example, to get behind a screen, ...why aren't we calling a violation, and make giving the technical a moot point?
Call the violation on a spot throw-in. Otherwise, for non throw-in situations, call the T if a player goes OOB and gains an unfair advantage.

Spence Tue Apr 12, 2005 06:30pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Camron Rust
Quote:

Originally posted by Spence
Quote:

Originally posted by BktBallRef
Quote:

Originally posted by FrankHtown
Ok...where does 9-2-12 fit in? "No teammate of the thrower shall be out of bounds after a designated-spot throw-in begins"

I interpret that to mean if a teammate of the thrower goes out of bounds, it's a throw-in violation. Is that the correct interpretation?

Are we to call a violation or a technical?

That's correct. It's a violation for a seconf player to be OOB when his team's thrower is already OOB with the ball.

Is this true only on a designated throw-in and not true after a made basket? I'm picturing the OOB play where A1 is taking it out against pressure, A2 runs out of bounds where A1 then passes it to him and A1 then goes inbounds to receive the pass.

Is this only a violation if its on a designated throw-in?

You are correct. The restriction is only applicable on a designated spot throwin.

Good to know.

Back In The Saddle Tue Apr 12, 2005 06:58pm

Quote:

Originally posted by walter
The only potential rule change that I've heard of (from a committee member)and apparently it is getting very serious consideration is expanding the high school coaching box to match the college coaching box (i.e. end line to 28 foot line). Other than that, nothing dramatic is being discussed.
Seems kind of pointless to me. I think I've seen a coach out of his box on the baseline end maybe once in the last couple of years. It's the other end that coaches seem to want expanded.

rainmaker Tue Apr 12, 2005 08:12pm

Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
Quote:

Originally posted by walter
The only potential rule change that I've heard of (from a committee member)and apparently it is getting very serious consideration is expanding the high school coaching box to match the college coaching box (i.e. end line to 28 foot line). Other than that, nothing dramatic is being discussed.
Seems kind of pointless to me. I think I've seen a coach out of his box on the baseline end maybe once in the last couple of years. It's the other end that coaches seem to want expanded.

You may be right over all, but the few times I've had a coach down near the baseline, it's been to rag on my partner or me. To not be able to remind him or her of the box will just increase the wear and tear.

Back In The Saddle Tue Apr 12, 2005 08:56pm

Quote:

Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
Quote:

Originally posted by walter
The only potential rule change that I've heard of (from a committee member)and apparently it is getting very serious consideration is expanding the high school coaching box to match the college coaching box (i.e. end line to 28 foot line). Other than that, nothing dramatic is being discussed.
Seems kind of pointless to me. I think I've seen a coach out of his box on the baseline end maybe once in the last couple of years. It's the other end that coaches seem to want expanded.

You may be right over all, but the few times I've had a coach down near the baseline, it's been to rag on my partner or me. To not be able to remind him or her of the box will just increase the wear and tear.

That was my experience too. If they seriously want to look at improving the coaching box rule, require an electric fence around the existing box. :D

refnrev Tue Apr 12, 2005 10:48pm

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
[B][QUOTE]Originally posted by rainmaker
Quote:

Originally posted by Back In The Saddle
Quote:

Originally posted by walter

You may be right over all, but the few times I've had a coach down near the baseline, it's been to rag on my partner or me. To not be able to remind him or her of the box will just increase the wear and tear.
That was my experience too. If they seriously want to look at improving the coaching box rule, require an electric fence around the existing box. :D
__________________________________________________ _________

How about a little of that razor aharp wire like they use in prisons?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1