![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
Having said that, looking at the magnification of the main camera angle, we can then see that it was a three point attempt. That would have been interesting because the R would have had to reverse his call!
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
Quote:
He had a great angle. Arm went up without hesitation. Shot went in. Ref slammed it home with style. No way those video angles will every be conclusive enough to overturn any call. The view from my recliner was 3 all the way! Actually I might have a 4. Looked like plenty of body contact on that shot to me.
__________________
![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
Could you contact me off the forum please. w9twj (at) hotmail (dot) com Thanks!! T Jones |
|
|||
Did anyone ever see the C actually signal a made 3-pointer??/ In other words - did anyone see him give the "touchdown" signal to the table...I ask this because in all the replays I've seen, the C immediately gives the 3-pt. attempt signal, then when it drops thru he hammers the "score the basket" signal toward the table, but then comes back up with only one hand and it sure looks like he has two fingers up to the table (as he's moving towards the table)...I never did see the made 3-pt. signal...did I just miss it, or did the cameras not catch it???
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
I was surprised there was no foul call. I didn't think the defender had established LGP. As a Spartan fan, I was afraid it would be called. Good job by the crew getting the calls right, even though they should have decided it sooner. Izzo should have had Davis in for the end of regulation, and UK wouldn't have gotten a third chance. Coach redeemed himself in OT. Go Green. Go White. |
|
|||
I do not believe what so ever that the inconclusive call is justified, but i also have two different takes.
ONE: If a shot goes up and it is too close to call it is always a two, no matter whether you signaled a three in college and then you get to go look at the monitor. if it is too close it is a two! There is no such thing as "the look on the monitor was inconclusive therefore the ruling on the field stands" (football NOT basketball, never basketball) if the look on the monitor can not give you conclusive evidence that it was a three, than you give the team a two. Two: THE OFFICIALS GOT IT RIGHT! I know i totally contradict myself here, but at this juncture in the game and in the tournament, you let these two great teams play it out and not win it on a technicality of the written above. So the refs say screw a little of basketball philosophy to let these two great teams play it out. So what! I wouldn't have had it any other way. GO REFS. by the way who worked the game I didn't get a chance to look? |
|
|||
If you think there was a foul there, please go back and look again.
I thought it was pretty obvious that the offender initiated the contact.
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|