Dear mick:

My English is poor, but my logic sense is not. Would you tell me the logical relation between "high paid" and "top of their trade"? I believe someone here mentioned that the pay was so low that referee could not be a full time job unless they were at NBA level. So based on your "logic", are those high school referees or college referee dumb because they are paid so little? (No offense to anybody who read this post please) I am wondering whether you are those high-paid ones or those "adfads" ones.

If you believe you are so knowledgeable, would you tell me when the definations of "team control" became different between NBA and other regulation bodies?

G'nite.

Yes your English is very poor. No it's not possible for me to translate it. Why do you believe I care what you think?

Anything else?

ysong,
The relationship between high pay and top of their trade is is direct. I believe the NBA implores supply-side economics, which advocates policies that raise capital and labor output by increasing the incentive to produce. Thus, doing a good officiating job for the NBA, provides a good product where the players, fans and coaches are willing to pay and participate, (ie, to buy) and the good officiating job is rewarded by higher pay.

The fact that officials work for or, in spite of, their pay has no direct relationship to intelligence.
I am not highly paid.
I do not know if I am an adfad.
I do not claim to be knowledgeable.
I do not judge volleyball, swimming, wrestling or NBA basketball.
I know that your "we" does not include me. Instead of using the term "We", perhaps your English skills may one day include idioms such as:
<I><LI>I think...<LI>In my opinion...<LI>It seems to me...</I>

mick

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mark Padgett
First of all, (and I am not calling you a "first of all") his use of the term "for starters" simply means this is his first point. It is not a description of a "rookie".

Oops!

Second, he is challenging your statement that "Those officials are bad, as we all know" which is a direct quote from your first post in this thread. So your own arguement about representing everybody else can be used against you, since that is what you implied.

Is it really that hard to see I was trying to be funny? Probably it was not funny, or no more funnier than people attack my English.


Third, the NF backcourt rule is consistent with their policy of ruling that the last person a ball touched "caused" the ball to do whatever it does. This is the same theory used to determine possession on OOB plays. It would be silly to use this theory only some of the time. Either it's valid or it's not.

Finally.
My original point is NBA backcourt rules encourage more competition, while NCAA rules actually forbid competition, in that particular case. So I am wondering why NCAA do not want to change that? It seems to me that it would be a good rule experiment, just like they are experimenting "restrict area" under the baskets.

Why do you believe that I believe you care what I think?

Yes. When you mean to be funny and do not express that through an obvious use of humor, then use a smilie - like this: :mad:


See - that was funny.

You're easily trained.

Polly wanna cracker?

You just made me laugh again. what a day!

An advice for you: stop using "we Jacka$$".

I wish you are as beautiful as your language is. By "your language", I do not mean English.

You are so cute. I only knew most people here were respectable, now I know they have layers too.

[Edited by ysong on Mar 23rd, 2005 at 08:37 PM]

The relationship between high pay and top of their trade is is direct. I believe the NBA implores supply-side economics, which advocates policies that raise capital and labor output by increasing the incentive to produce.

[/B][/QUOTE]Is it possible that you can get this translated to English and repost it?

I only knew most people here were respectful, now I know they have layers too.

[/B][/QUOTE]I'll lay you ten to one that you're right.

Of course, if you don't like the hours we can negotiate.

Is it possible that you can get this translated to English and repost it? [/B][/QUOTE]

We, sorry, I take that back, in my opionion, he deserves some credits by no using "we Jacka$$".

Editted version, eh?

Is it possible you deleted the part that might have made even the least bit of sense, and left this?

I'll lay you ten to one that you're right.

Of course, if you don't like the hours we can negotiate. [/B][/QUOTE]

Puh-leeze.

Only a fool would fling the blue sprockets but cats won't make door knobs sound like rust.

Yes, I editted it. My original post was "people here are respectable". then I realized that you were here too, so I added the word "most". So it became "most people here are respectable".

It seems to me that you can be easily trained too.